• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
    • BT
    • MA
    • FA
    • LW
    • PM
    • TX-UK
    • FR
    • AA
    • FM
    • SBL
    • SBR
    • AAA
    • AFM
    • APM
    • ATX
    • Dates
    • What is ACCA

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

ACCA F7 June 2005 Question 1 Highveldt

VIVA
ACCA F7 past exams lecturesDownload F7 Q&A from ACCA website

[jwplatform fGDSD5u4]

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. ujawed says

    September 5, 2016 at 10:42 pm

    has anyone prepared consolidated FS for this question is yes kindly share it please

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      September 6, 2016 at 7:39 am

      What’s the problem with Highveldt? Please post your response on the Ask ACCA Tutor forum if you want me to help you with Highveldt

      Log in to Reply
      • shanif007 says

        May 11, 2017 at 3:54 pm

        hello sir i have a problem in this question why 10m of amotisation add back in subsidary net assets in post retain earnings..??

      • MikeLittle says

        May 11, 2017 at 4:39 pm

        I have a copy of Highveldt in front of me … and I see no sign whatsoever of a $10 million add back neither pre- nor post-acquisition

        ?

      • shanif007 says

        May 11, 2017 at 7:53 pm

        sir am talking about adjustment 4 (development cost) i didn’t understand of this adjustment

      • MikeLittle says

        May 11, 2017 at 9:18 pm

        OK

        $18 million had been capitalised as at date of acquisition

        As at reporting date there was $40 million capitalised, net of the $10 million that had been expensed

        None of the $50 million should have been capitalised – it should all have been expensed as incurred according to Highveldt

        So net assets as at date of acquisition are overstated by $18 million and, as at reporting date, they are overstated by $40 million

        I have the Kaplan version of the answer and I don’t see any add-back of $10 million

        What I DO see is a deduction of $40 million – I suppose that this may be what you are looking at ie why is this $40 million and not $50 million

        I believe that I have just explained why it is what it is

        OK?

  2. tauraiversatile says

    July 5, 2013 at 1:40 pm

    Eish!

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      July 5, 2013 at 5:57 pm

      What?

      Log in to Reply
  3. Aniqa Nisar says

    May 22, 2013 at 1:43 pm

    Hey Mike,
    Got a bit of a confusion. Why are we adding 6 as an interest income when it is an inter company loan, why shouldn’t we subtract it? Could you please explain?
    Thanks.

    Log in to Reply
    • peepsmusthu says

      December 3, 2021 at 2:05 pm

      Even i want to know tbis please reply anyone who knows

      Log in to Reply
  4. jasmine23 says

    May 8, 2013 at 4:05 am

    Thank you so much. Kindly try and check the figures for the NCI and Impairment loss, it could be confusing though because the right figures were not used hence the answer is different from the revision kit. Thank you

    Log in to Reply
  5. saddamali92 says

    September 24, 2012 at 6:17 pm

    gud\

    Log in to Reply
  6. katrinamohammedali2641 says

    June 7, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    i feel so much btr cause mike’s so positive!!!

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in