I wasted so much time by struggling over the books, our lectures are very fast and not explained or interpreted in such detail. I love it, well done to all of you who contributed to this great helpful website!! I am now going definately pass. I finally understand all of it.
Sir in the case of Partridge v Crittenden (1968) defendant mentioned the price of each bird so it should be an offer not a invitation to treat. i am confused about it. Describe it plz!
@umairhanif, It was an advert – therefore, it’s an invitation. That’s a principla which the judges appear very keen to preserve! The only time an advert will not be taken as an invitation is when it’s in a “reward” situation ( Williams v Carwardine, Carlill v Carbolic, R v Clark )
@umairhanif, it doesn’t matter whether or not there was an indicated price – goods in a shop or supermarket, priced or not priced, are invitations, NOT OFFERS
Some students are so ungrateful..it really stinks!!!!! Its free and helpful be thankful atleast!!!! Thanks to all the lecturers for the support you have given to us.
Sir my teacher has said that carlill v carbolic smoke balls case that lady gets the money and u r saying she didnt get that why is that plz reply me sir i m so confused.
@Abrar khan, Are you sure that that is what I said? I cannot for one minute believe that I said the Carbolic Company won. NEVER have I EVER said that Carbolic won
I wasted so much time by struggling over the books, our lectures are very fast and not explained or interpreted in such detail. I love it, well done to all of you who contributed to this great helpful website!! I am now going definately pass. I finally understand all of it.
wondefull
Sir in the case of Partridge v Crittenden (1968) defendant mentioned the price of each bird so it should be an offer not a invitation to treat. i am confused about it. Describe it plz!
@umairhanif, It was an advert – therefore, it’s an invitation. That’s a principla which the judges appear very keen to preserve! The only time an advert will not be taken as an invitation is when it’s in a “reward” situation ( Williams v Carwardine, Carlill v Carbolic, R v Clark )
Sir if the poisons are mentioned with the price tags then it could be an offer or not in the Boots cash chemist case(1953)?
@umairhanif, it doesn’t matter whether or not there was an indicated price – goods in a shop or supermarket, priced or not priced, are invitations, NOT OFFERS
Some students are so ungrateful..it really stinks!!!!! Its free and helpful be thankful atleast!!!!
Thanks to all the lecturers for the support you have given to us.
Good lecture. It topic understandable for me.
Sir my teacher has said that carlill v carbolic smoke balls case that lady gets the money and u r saying she didnt get that why is that plz reply me sir i m so confused.
@Abrar khan, Listen to the part 2 chapter 4 video and find out what decision was made. The civil case was eventually made in favour of Mrs Carlill. 馃檪
@Abrar khan, Are you sure that that is what I said? I cannot for one minute believe that I said the Carbolic Company won. NEVER have I EVER said that Carbolic won
Hello,
I’m having trouble viewing the lectures. Can someone please tell me how to view them.
Thanks
use google chrome
@admin, its not workin on my iphone but it says it works perfectly on apple safari ..Any idea?
You should know, iPhone does not support Flash, flash is a plugin for Safari, it exists for PCs but not iphones/ipads
@aamirnadeem, this lecture should now work on the iPhone,
Hi guys m feeling trouble in watching these lectures online . Can anybody plz let me know how cn i play these on ma ifone… ?
perfect!!
Good lecture i wish i knew about this a long time ago now was just told last week by a friend
Appreciate for provide the good lecture
very understandable
it ia amasing
great , and good approach to learn skillful accounting………..
great lecture 馃檪 this guy’s funny
ha ha ha, funny case names. Boothvpharmaceutical comp. . poison case. . thank you for such a lovely lecture.
law bites
asd
this is great stuff