would the exam ask about an entry (although accounting entries questions are rare) about scrap account? – my kaplan book has another account called scrap account which is kind of confusing what the entries are.
I make it very clear in the lectures that the account itself is not very important for the exam – you cannot be asked to write up an account, but you just could possibly be asked one or two of the entries. What is important for the exam is to calculate the costs per unit and for this you do not need an account (as again I explain in the lectures).
All the account is doing is keeping track of what is happening to the units and sorting out the cost of the units.
We credit the account with losses and debit the loss account simply again to keep track of what happens to the units that go in, and to keep track of what happens to the ‘losses’ (i.e. whether they are thrown away or are sold).
A credit in the process account does not ‘stand for’ anything – it simply is a way of recording again what happens to the units.
thanks for your explanation it makes more sense now. just to check – it is recording what inputs there were (debit) and recording what happens to those input in terms of units (credit)?
I have another question about abnormal gain – my kaplan book does not total the unit with the abnormal gain figure, (i.e made 1000 units but there was an abnormal gain of 20, but the total is 1000 not 1020) is this correct? surely it should be added on right?
I got antoher question, so in current period, if nobody is buying, but i expect next period there might be somebody who wants to buy it, can i transfer the balance under loss account to an asset account, lets say scrap stock, instead of closing the remaining balance to P&L?
The income statement is a statement showing how much profit the company made. You are not required to produce an income statement in Paper F2 (it is all examined in Paper F3).
Because when we calculate the cost per unit, we only ever take into account the normal loss. (If we took into account the abnormal loss or gain then the cost per unit would keep changing every period.) The abnormal gain or loss is then costed at the full cost per unit.
Nice lectures, though i still wonder why in the loss account the 50kg loss was valued at the normal scrap value of $9 which was the abnormal loss or unexpected loss but when deducted it was valued at full cost per unit.
50kg * $44 = 2200
50kg * $9 = 450 total loss $1750
value in the loss account was $1350…. here both normal loss and abnormal loss were calculated to get 150* $9.. just do not get the mathematical theory of this.
The abnormal losses are charged at full unit cost. The final loss resulting is the difference between the full unit cost and whatever money is received from selling them as scrap.
tatsiana88says
Good evening, thank you again for great help. I was just wondering about loss account, I thought it is a scrap account – where in debit we write normal loss+ abnormal loss and on credit cash we expect to receive from selling. And in loss account we in debit put unexpected loss and in credit amount that goes to income statement
What you say is correct, except for your last sentence. The unexpected loss is the same as the abnormal loss, so we do not enter it twice. It is the balance on the loss account that gets transferred to the income statement.
(However don’t be too worried about the debits and credits – they are very unlikely to be needed in the exam itself)
Hi there. I didn麓t understand the T account, why don麓t we put the scrap money we get from the 50kg on the right side of the Process account like we did with the 100kg?
Have you watched the lecture in full (because around 12 minutes into the lecture you should find the answer to your question!!)
Abnormal losses are always valued in the process account at full cost per unit (in this case $44). The net loss to appear in the profit statement as a result of the abnormal loss is the value of the losses less the extra scrap proceeds that we receive from them – which comes to 1750.
Thank you for another great lecture. May I ask you something specific to your lecture? At 05:27 you state that “if they ask you for the cost per unit you ‘re finished”. Which is $44 p.u. Is this true even though there is another further abnormal loss? This might be clarified later in the lecture.
Sir pl Help me with this question on process costing A company expect normal Loss of 10% of input in a process Mat. Input 400 liter $8 Conversion cost $4800 output 330 liter, Losses are identified when the process is 60% complete. There was no opening or closing wip What is the value of the completed output? Pl. help not sure how to work the problem with the 60% complete
Hello Sir. First of all thank you very much for your lectures. I believe I might have a little out of the box question here though. I understand with expected (normal) loss, at times you get to sell back these units at a scrap value, which you would then minus this amount from the cost of the process, then you calculate, the cost per unit, by dividing total cost of the process by expected output. But won鈥檛 it be prudent not to minus this sale of scrap units from the total cost of the process until you get this sale, because you might not get this sale?
If we were preparing financial accounts then you would have a point, and prudence is relevant. However the purpose of management accounting is not to calculate the profit that has been made in the past, but make decisions for the future. For example, to help decide on a selling price we need to estimate what the cost is likely to be. To be able to prepare budgets for next year we need to estimate what the costs are likely to be. So, in estimating the costs we not only need to estimate how much we will have to spend but also need to estimate how much we expect to receive back from scrap.
Sir my Question may be silly for U, but I really need an answer… I somehow want to get a world prize for any units in ACCA… Sir How hard should I work?… Im ready to study even 10hrs a day Sometimes things are forgetting especially F1 notes…. Its not sticking into the mind.. Pls help me sir, How did u manage these constraints?
The best and only advice I can give you is practice. You must have Revision/Exam Kits from one of the approved publishers (they contain lots of exam-standard questions) and you must practice and practice and practice. When you are confident that you can get the questions right, then you must practice them again under time pressure. With the first three papers, one of the biggest problems is the time pressure in the exam – it is when you are rushing in the exam that you misread questions and make silly mistakes, however good you may be at the subject.
You are correct that the total loss is 15%, but it is 15% of the input (not the output).
So….for every 100 litres input it would mean 15 are lost and therefore 85 are output. Or (putting it the other way round) for every 85 output there must be 100 input.
For 340 output therefore, the input must be 340 x 100/85 = 400 litres. Now you will find it works 馃檪
Hi, I am practicing some questions and I got stuck at this particular one. It seems easy but I am not confident if my ans was right.
“A company needs to produce 340 litres of chemical X. There is a normal loss of 10% of the material input into the process. During a given month, the company did produce 340 litres of good production although there was an abnormal loss of 5% of the material input into the process. How many litres of material were input into the process during the month?”
a) 357 litres b) 375 litres c) 391 litres d) 400 litres
I tried doing it backwards by using 340 x 1.15 = 391. But when I used 391 x 0.75, the ans (output) does not tally to 340. Pls help!
qualifiedattracterofbeauty says
would the exam ask about an entry (although accounting entries questions are rare) about scrap account? – my kaplan book has another account called scrap account which is kind of confusing what the entries are.
John Moffat says
Scrap is another word for loss. I explain the account in my lectures.
qualifiedattracterofbeauty says
why do you credit the normal loss and abnormal loss in the process account but debit it in the loss account?
what does the process account record? is it an expense account? is it recording the flow of where the money spent on the materials is going into?
what exactly is a process account? and what does putting an entry as a credit in the process account stand for?
John Moffat says
I make it very clear in the lectures that the account itself is not very important for the exam – you cannot be asked to write up an account, but you just could possibly be asked one or two of the entries. What is important for the exam is to calculate the costs per unit and for this you do not need an account (as again I explain in the lectures).
All the account is doing is keeping track of what is happening to the units and sorting out the cost of the units.
We credit the account with losses and debit the loss account simply again to keep track of what happens to the units that go in, and to keep track of what happens to the ‘losses’ (i.e. whether they are thrown away or are sold).
A credit in the process account does not ‘stand for’ anything – it simply is a way of recording again what happens to the units.
qualifiedattracterofbeauty says
thanks for your explanation it makes more sense now. just to check – it is recording what inputs there were (debit) and recording what happens to those input in terms of units (credit)?
I have another question about abnormal gain – my kaplan book does not total the unit with the abnormal gain figure, (i.e made 1000 units but there was an abnormal gain of 20, but the total is 1000 not 1020) is this correct? surely it should be added on right?
John Moffat says
If they made 1,000 units then they made 1,000 units!!
If there is an abnormal gain of 20 units then it must mean that they had only expected to make 980 units.
loukasierides says
Dear Sir, just to be certain the loss a/c is an expense account and so the debit side represents the expenses?
John Moffat says
Correct 馃檪
loukasierides says
thank you very much!
John Moffat says
You are welcome 馃檪
fatezalez says
sir is it so important to learn how to prepare a T account for this whole topic?
Mingdao says
So if nobody is buying the units under loss account, it will be transfer to income statement as loss?
John Moffat says
True, because the scrap proceeds will be zero 馃檪
Mingdao says
Dear sir, thanks for your replying
I got antoher question, so in current period, if nobody is buying, but i expect next period there might be somebody who wants to buy it, can i transfer the balance under loss account to an asset account, lets say scrap stock, instead of closing the remaining balance to P&L?
John Moffat says
Yes. Although this is irrelevant for the exam.
Mingdao says
Thank you sir your explaination really help me to understand this
John Moffat says
You are welcome 馃檪
qualifiedattracterofbeauty says
so is everything from the accounts transferred onto an income statement?
what exactly is an income statement?
-thank you
John Moffat says
The income statement is a statement showing how much profit the company made. You are not required to produce an income statement in Paper F2 (it is all examined in Paper F3).
tahajaffri says
hi John…why u did not less scrap value of abnormal loss from total cost of output(calculating cost per unit)??what is the reason behind it?
John Moffat says
Because when we calculate the cost per unit, we only ever take into account the normal loss. (If we took into account the abnormal loss or gain then the cost per unit would keep changing every period.)
The abnormal gain or loss is then costed at the full cost per unit.
iyamu says
Nice lectures, though i still wonder why in the loss account the 50kg loss was valued at the normal scrap value of $9 which was the abnormal loss or unexpected loss but when deducted it was valued at full cost per unit.
50kg * $44 = 2200
50kg * $9 = 450
total loss $1750
value in the loss account was $1350…. here both normal loss and abnormal loss were calculated to get 150* $9.. just do not get the mathematical theory of this.
John Moffat says
There is no mathematical theory involved!
The abnormal losses are charged at full unit cost.
The final loss resulting is the difference between the full unit cost and whatever money is received from selling them as scrap.
tatsiana88 says
Good evening, thank you again for great help. I was just wondering about loss account, I thought it is a scrap account – where in debit we write normal loss+ abnormal loss and on credit cash we expect to receive from selling. And in loss account we in debit put unexpected loss and in credit amount that goes to income statement
John Moffat says
What you say is correct, except for your last sentence. The unexpected loss is the same as the abnormal loss, so we do not enter it twice.
It is the balance on the loss account that gets transferred to the income statement.
(However don’t be too worried about the debits and credits – they are very unlikely to be needed in the exam itself)
torridest says
Hi there. I didn麓t understand the T account, why don麓t we put the scrap money we get from the 50kg on the right side of the Process account like we did with the 100kg?
John Moffat says
Because the 50kg is an abnormal loss and they are charged at the full cost per kg.
The scarp money is credited to the loss account.
shreyas says
sir in the process account why is abnormal loss valued at $44(50 kg x $44= 2200) because in our cost sheet its valued at $36 (i.e 50 kg x $36 =1750)
John Moffat says
Have you watched the lecture in full (because around 12 minutes into the lecture you should find the answer to your question!!)
Abnormal losses are always valued in the process account at full cost per unit (in this case $44).
The net loss to appear in the profit statement as a result of the abnormal loss is the value of the losses less the extra scrap proceeds that we receive from them – which comes to 1750.
loukasierides says
Yes it is! It took some time to sink in.
John Moffat says
Glad you got sorted out 馃檪
loukasierides says
Dear Sir,
Thank you for another great lecture. May I ask you something specific to your lecture? At 05:27 you state that “if they ask you for the cost per unit you ‘re finished”. Which is $44 p.u. Is this true even though there is another further abnormal loss? This might be clarified later in the lecture.
annettecholness says
Sir pl
Help me with this question on process costing
A company expect normal
Loss of 10% of input in a process
Mat. Input 400 liter $8
Conversion cost $4800 output 330 liter,
Losses are identified when the process is 60% complete. There was no opening or closing wip
What is the value of the completed output?
Pl. help not sure how to work the problem with the 60% complete
stephen1010 says
Hello Sir. First of all thank you very much for your lectures. I believe I might have a little out of the box question here though. I understand with expected (normal) loss, at times you get to sell back these units at a scrap value, which you would then minus this amount from the cost of the process, then you calculate, the cost per unit, by dividing total cost of the process by expected output. But won鈥檛 it be prudent not to minus this sale of scrap units from the total cost of the process until you get this sale, because you might not get this sale?
John Moffat says
If we were preparing financial accounts then you would have a point, and prudence is relevant.
However the purpose of management accounting is not to calculate the profit that has been made in the past, but make decisions for the future. For example, to help decide on a selling price we need to estimate what the cost is likely to be. To be able to prepare budgets for next year we need to estimate what the costs are likely to be.
So, in estimating the costs we not only need to estimate how much we will have to spend but also need to estimate how much we expect to receive back from scrap.
Shahir says
We transfer the actual output to the finished goods right?
John Moffat says
It is either transferred to finished goods, or in some case it will be transferred to the next process (if there are several processes).
Shahir says
Sir my Question may be silly for U, but I really need an answer… I somehow want to get a world prize for any units in ACCA…
Sir How hard should I work?… Im ready to study even 10hrs a day
Sometimes things are forgetting especially F1 notes….
Its not sticking into the mind..
Pls help me sir, How did u manage these constraints?
John Moffat says
The best and only advice I can give you is practice. You must have Revision/Exam Kits from one of the approved publishers (they contain lots of exam-standard questions) and you must practice and practice and practice.
When you are confident that you can get the questions right, then you must practice them again under time pressure.
With the first three papers, one of the biggest problems is the time pressure in the exam – it is when you are rushing in the exam that you misread questions and make silly mistakes, however good you may be at the subject.
Shahir says
Okay.. I have only Kaplan.. is there any other Approved exam kits??
John Moffat says
Yes – from BPP and from Becker.
John Moffat says
You are correct that the total loss is 15%, but it is 15% of the input (not the output).
So….for every 100 litres input it would mean 15 are lost and therefore 85 are output.
Or (putting it the other way round) for every 85 output there must be 100 input.
For 340 output therefore, the input must be 340 x 100/85 = 400 litres.
Now you will find it works 馃檪
Hope that helps!
Michelle says
Thx Sir!!
John Moffat says
You are welcome 馃檪
Michelle says
Hi, I am practicing some questions and I got stuck at this particular one. It seems easy but I am not confident if my ans was right.
“A company needs to produce 340 litres of chemical X. There is a normal loss of 10% of the material input into the process. During a given month, the company did produce 340 litres of good production although there was an abnormal loss of 5% of the material input into the process. How many litres of material were input into the process during the month?”
a) 357 litres
b) 375 litres
c) 391 litres
d) 400 litres
I tried doing it backwards by using 340 x 1.15 = 391. But when I used 391 x 0.75, the ans (output) does not tally to 340. Pls help!
Bardhyl says
Input-Normal losses-Abnormal losses=Output=340
x-0.1x-0.05x=340
0.85x=340
X=Total input=340/0.85=400
400*85%=340