Hello Sir , I just have one issue , if you please mention the questions also on ur lectures , it will be helpful , because on your lecture your only showing the answers , Kindly mention the questions also … so we could understand more clearly , Because I dont have F2 Book. Im studying from BPP notes.
Dear Sir, what about the fact that using the physical units approach and market value gives rise to a different profit? Is this irrelevant to our exam?
I still cannot solve the following joint product question after watching your video. What if there are opening and closing WIP in the joint process, like the question below? How should I apportion joint cost to the joint products in this situation. Grateful if you can help solve the question below as I read many reference book but still cannot find a solution to it.
XYZ plc, a paint manufacturer, operates a process costing system. The following details related to process 2 for the month of October:
Opening work in progress 5000 litres fully complete as to transfers from process 1 and 40% complete as to labour and overhead, valued at £60000
Transfer from process 1 65000 litres valued at cost of £578500
Direct labour £101400
Variable overhead £80000
Fixed overhead £40000
Normal loss 5% of volume transferred from process 1,scrap value £2.00 per litre
Actual output 30000 litres of paint X (a joint product) 25000 litres of paint Y (a joint product) 7000 litres of by-product Z
Closing work in progress 6000 litres fully complete as to transfers from process 1 and 60% complete as to labour and overhead.
The final selling price of products X, Y and Z are: Paint X £15.00 per litre Paint Y £18.00 per litre Product Z £4.00 per litre
There are no further processing costs associated with either paint X or the by-product, but paint Y requires further processing at a cost of £1.50 per litre.
All three products incur packaging costs of £0.50 per litre before they can be sold.
Required:(a)Prepare the process 2 account for the month of October, apportioning the common costs between the joint products, based upon their values at the point of separation.
(b)Prepare the abnormal loss/gain account, showing clearly the amount to be transferred to the profit and loss account.
Dear Sir, This costing method can be differ, like if the Joint Products valuation can be determined separately…even than the cost per unit will be calculated on equal part..or its purely management decision.
If we could measure the costs for each product separately, then it would not be ‘joint products’. Joint products is where we cannot identify which bit of the costs relate to which product. In this case it is up to management to decide how they wish to split the costs between the products – there is no rule. For the exam, you just need the two methods that I go through in the lecture.
Hi sir Could you explain the 20% on the closing inventory in the answer for this question. I do not understand how the 20% came about and it was not mentioned in the question
The question states: Two products (W and X) are created from a joint process. Both products can be sols immediately after split-off. There are no opening or work in progress. The following information is available for last period:
Total joint production cost $776 160 Product W Production Units 12000 Sales 10 000 Selling price per unit $10
Product X Prod. units 10 000 Sales 8 000 Selling price per unit $12
Using the sales value method of apportioning joint production costs, what was the value of the closing inventory of product X for last period
The answer states 12 000 * 10 = 120 000 10 000 * 12 = 120 000 X= 776 160/2 = 388080 20% of X is closing 388080 * 20% = 77616
The production of X is 10000 units, of which 8,000 are sold. This leaves 2,000 units in inventory, which is 20% of the production. So it is valued at 20% of the cost of production.
Goodday Johnmoffat. I would appreciate u help with this Question
A Co. Operates a Proces that produces two Joints Products-P & Q. Last month Joints Cost of $35,000 were incurred and the Organisation apportions these costs to Joints Products using the sales Value Method.
Data relation to last month were are follows
Product P -Production 12000kg; Sales 10000kg; selling Price per kg $5.00
Product Q -Production 8000kg, Sales 9000kg; selling price per kg $10.00
How much of the joint cost were apportioned to Product P last month
My Answer as per below : Joint Cost were apportioned to the Product P is $12,500.00 based on the question request, using the “Sales Value Method “the working as per below : Product P = 10,000 kg X$5.00 = $ 50,000.00 Product Q = 9,000 kg X $10.00 = $ 90,000.00 Total $140,000.00
so Joint cost for the Product P = 50000/140000 X $35,000.00 = $12,500.00 Please correct me
Because it is the production costs that are being apportioned. Just imagine that they didn’t sell anything at all in this period (they were all in inventory and sold in the next period) – they would still have cost money to produce 🙂 Same with the NRV approach.
lots lots of thanx for the nice lecture & diagram explanation but i have some concept not clear
of joint product &by-product in bbp we have 2 Question it mention b-product sales revenue is credited to the process account here in this question we deduct the the by-product amount from total joint cost
Another question it mentioned the by -product is credited to the sales account there we r not deducting the by-product amount from total joint product amount plz explain me this thanx
@admirableprinces, There is no ‘law’ about how to deal with a by-product. Usually we subtract the value of the by-product from the total join costs (which is the same as crediting the process account). However, if the question says to treat the revenue as sales then you do what you are told, and in this case we do not reduce the join cost.
celanadurham says
Best thing ever. Was really helpful
John Moffat says
Thank you for the comment 🙂
mariokeme says
Thanks so much Sir, I finally understand the Market Value and NRV basis. Amazing and simple explanation!!
John Moffat says
Thank you for your comment 🙂
7unzaa says
Hello Sir , I just have one issue , if you please mention the questions also on ur lectures , it will be helpful , because on your lecture your only showing the answers , Kindly mention the questions also … so we could understand more clearly , Because I dont have F2 Book. Im studying from BPP notes.
John Moffat says
But at the beginning of every lecture you are told to download our free lecture notes.
The lectures are all indexed to the chapters in the lecture notes and the examples are all in the notes!!
shabaazj says
I cannot understand why do we have negative joint cost allocation under Constant Gross Margin Method?
John Moffat says
The joint cost allocation is not negative!!
It is simply that if we allocate the joint costs on physical units basis that the cost might be more than the selling price.
Please do watch the lecture again 🙂
loukasierides says
Dear Sir, what about the fact that using the physical units approach and market value gives rise to a different profit? Is this irrelevant to our exam?
John Moffat says
In any one year the profit will be different because the inventory is valued differently, but in the long run the profit will be the same.
However it is irrelevant anyway – we are not doing financial accounts.
loukasierides says
thank you for the response. I just assed the f3 and i guess I’m prone to still think in a financial accounting approach
John Moffat says
You are welcome
loukasierides says
hahahahahaha excellent! thank you for the lecture and for making my day!
henry00195 says
Goodday John Moffat,
I still cannot solve the following joint product question after watching your video. What if there are opening and closing WIP in the joint process, like the question below? How should I apportion joint cost to the joint products in this situation. Grateful if you can help solve the question below as I read many reference book but still cannot find a solution to it.
XYZ plc, a paint manufacturer, operates a process costing system. The following details related to process 2 for the month of October:
Opening work in progress
5000 litres fully complete as to transfers from process 1 and 40% complete as to labour and overhead, valued at £60000
Transfer from process 1
65000 litres valued at cost of £578500
Direct labour
£101400
Variable overhead
£80000
Fixed overhead
£40000
Normal loss
5% of volume transferred from process 1,scrap value £2.00 per litre
Actual output
30000 litres of paint X (a joint product)
25000 litres of paint Y (a joint product)
7000 litres of by-product Z
Closing work in progress
6000 litres fully complete as to transfers from process 1 and 60% complete as to labour and overhead.
The final selling price of products X, Y and Z are:
Paint X £15.00 per litre
Paint Y £18.00 per litre
Product Z £4.00 per litre
There are no further processing costs associated with either paint X or the by-product, but paint Y requires further processing at a cost of £1.50 per litre.
All three products incur packaging costs of £0.50 per litre before they can be sold.
Required:(a)Prepare the process 2 account for the month of October, apportioning the common costs between the joint products, based upon their values at the point of separation.
(b)Prepare the abnormal loss/gain account, showing clearly the amount to be transferred to the profit and loss account.
John Moffat says
You must ask this sort of question in the Ask the Tutor Forum, and not as a comment on a lecture.
henry00195 says
Sorry, I have copied the content to the ask acca tutor forum. Hope if I can get your help, thanks.
John Moffat says
You are welcome 🙂
sxhawty says
do you have a lecture for job costing?
John Moffat says
No – it does not need a lecture because the principles are the same as covered in the existing lectures.
Munazza says
Dear Sir,
This costing method can be differ, like if the Joint Products valuation can be determined separately…even than the cost per unit will be calculated on equal part..or its purely management decision.
John Moffat says
Your question confused me a little bit.
If we could measure the costs for each product separately, then it would not be ‘joint products’. Joint products is where we cannot identify which bit of the costs relate to which product.
In this case it is up to management to decide how they wish to split the costs between the products – there is no rule.
For the exam, you just need the two methods that I go through in the lecture.
godze26 says
Hi sir
Could you explain the 20% on the closing inventory in the answer for this question. I do not understand how the 20% came about and it was not mentioned in the question
The question states:
Two products (W and X) are created from a joint process. Both products can be sols immediately after split-off. There are no opening or work in progress. The following information is available for last period:
Total joint production cost $776 160
Product W
Production Units 12000
Sales 10 000
Selling price per unit $10
Product X
Prod. units 10 000
Sales 8 000
Selling price per unit $12
Using the sales value method of apportioning joint production costs, what was the value of the closing inventory of product X for last period
The answer states
12 000 * 10 = 120 000
10 000 * 12 = 120 000
X= 776 160/2 = 388080
20% of X is closing 388080 * 20% = 77616
John Moffat says
The production of X is 10000 units, of which 8,000 are sold. This leaves 2,000 units in inventory, which is 20% of the production. So it is valued at 20% of the cost of production.
godze26 says
Thanks very much for your prompt response.
sooner says
thank you johnmoffat
sooner says
Goodday Johnmoffat. I would appreciate u help with this Question
A Co. Operates a Proces that produces two Joints Products-P & Q. Last month Joints Cost of $35,000 were incurred
and the Organisation apportions these costs to Joints Products using the sales Value Method.
Data relation to last month were are follows
Product P -Production 12000kg; Sales 10000kg; selling Price per kg $5.00
Product Q -Production 8000kg, Sales 9000kg; selling price per kg $10.00
How much of the joint cost were apportioned to Product P last month
John Moffat says
The sales value of P’s production is 12,000 x $5 per kg
The sales value of Q’s production is 8000 x $10 per kg.
You apportion the joint cost on the basis of the sales values of production as above
chewcck says
My Answer as per below :
Joint Cost were apportioned to the Product P is $12,500.00
based on the question request, using the “Sales Value Method “the working as per below :
Product P = 10,000 kg X$5.00 = $ 50,000.00
Product Q = 9,000 kg X $10.00 = $ 90,000.00
Total $140,000.00
so Joint cost for the Product P = 50000/140000 X $35,000.00 = $12,500.00
Please correct me
John Moffat says
My answer above is correct.
The joint costs are apportioned on the sales value of the units produced (not the units sold).
nzrn89 says
Sir, may I know why sales value method uses production units instead of units sold?
And for net realizable value method, will we use production units instead of sold units as well?
Thank you sir
John Moffat says
Because it is the production costs that are being apportioned. Just imagine that they didn’t sell anything at all in this period (they were all in inventory and sold in the next period) – they would still have cost money to produce 🙂
Same with the NRV approach.
admirableprinces says
lots lots of thanx for the nice lecture & diagram explanation but i have some concept not clear
of joint product &by-product in bbp we have 2 Question it mention b-product sales revenue is credited to the process account here in this question we deduct the the by-product amount from total joint cost
Another question it mentioned the by -product is credited to the sales account there we r not deducting the by-product amount from total joint product amount plz explain me this thanx
admirableprinces says
this also a by -product of 1000 kg which has a commerciAL value of $ 600 what commercial value means selling price or wht ?
John Moffat says
@admirableprinces, There is no ‘law’ about how to deal with a by-product. Usually we subtract the value of the by-product from the total join costs (which is the same as crediting the process account). However, if the question says to treat the revenue as sales then you do what you are told, and in this case we do not reduce the join cost.
Commercial value is the same as sales value.
M. Osman Kamran says
Great explanation.
mithu415 says
i like it very much…
Sangria9 says
Great explanation on joint products!
ahumad says
great sir….
rosiczka80 says
excellent,such a simple explanation
angeria says
great…. explanation can’t be any easier
fortissimo says
Great stuff, sir. Haven’t seen anything better.