I am missing 22M to balance it out. I guess (as others mentioned) this comes from the issue of new shares 20 + 2 on House. This should be dealth with under Equity and not OCE, right? If so how do we come to a total OCE of 25.4M?
I guess he’s just missed it, like he failed to mention the figure of the investment in House at the initial data of Kutchen’s SFP. besides, I would have never ever guessed what figure Kutchen recorded in the OCE as a gain on sale of Niche, because there wasn’t any, it was a loss. and why for god’s sake does the impairment of the building located overseas include foreign exchange loss in itself?? but at least both figures go to the retained earnings, so there was no overall mistake, but there was a mistake in classification.
apart from the mistake of the lecturer with the ordinary share capital of $20m, I wonder where the examiner put the other components of equity of $22m from the issue of shares of $20m and the contingent consideration of $2m.
I have a question though, the official answer has the share capital as 63 (43+20 for the purchase of House I presume) but you have placed it as only 43. Which would be correct?
Georgios says
Hi,
I am missing 22M to balance it out. I guess (as others mentioned) this comes from the issue of new shares 20 + 2 on House. This should be dealth with under Equity and not OCE, right? If so how do we come to a total OCE of 25.4M?
Thanks,
Georgios
Georgios says
Ill reply to myself as I found the solution on the past paper answers
Issue new shares for purchase of house
Dr. Inv in House 42
Cr. Ordinary Sh Cap -20
Cr. OCE -22
kelly says
This is very helpful.
Please can we have a revision lecture for a P/L question? This is more difficult so it would be great to have to talk through a past exam question!!
kingsleychiwayula says
Splendid. Please do more questions….
Victoria says
I guess he’s just missed it, like he failed to mention the figure of the investment in House at the initial data of Kutchen’s SFP. besides, I would have never ever guessed what figure Kutchen recorded in the OCE as a gain on sale of Niche, because there wasn’t any, it was a loss. and why for god’s sake does the impairment of the building located overseas include foreign exchange loss in itself?? but at least both figures go to the retained earnings, so there was no overall mistake, but there was a mistake in classification.
Victoria says
apart from the mistake of the lecturer with the ordinary share capital of $20m, I wonder where the examiner put the other components of equity of $22m from the issue of shares of $20m and the contingent consideration of $2m.
scribbz says
This is a superb worked example and talk through the various points and techniques, thank you very kindly for making it available!
gabrielalexandra says
Great lecture. Please post more, very helpful, good approach and very well explained.
auseklis says
Please upload more revision lectures of past exam paper questions. thanks
coty says
l want to watch p2 revision but cant open
vilma says
New Lecturer to OT? Different approach to the question, IMO very well explained, thank you so much.
ulle says
Does anyone know where the link to revision lectures like this one please?
ulle says
very good lecture.please opload more
sophiaivy says
great lecture how i wish they were at least five papers done
Ahmed says
Thanks for the lecture.
I have a question though, the official answer has the share capital as 63 (43+20 for the purchase of House I presume) but you have placed it as only 43. Which would be correct?
martin says
great lecture well done