Hi Sir, I’m having a problem to understand what was done in current assets concerning cash in transit. I understood why we neet to add 200,000 as this refers to increase in cash (making as if the other company has already received the cash). We will also need to lower 600,000 to 400,000. But i don’t understand why you have subtracted 200,000 again as you already put 400k instead of 600k.
I have a question regarding Pedantic. Basically, in my Kaplan Exam kit there is a note(v):
“Pedantic has a policy of accounting for any non-controlling interest at fair value. The fair value of non-controlling interest at the acquisition date was $5.9 million. Consolidated goodwill was impaired by $1 million at 30 September 2008. ”
In the answer they have deducted the goodwill impairment of $1 million from the calculation of goodwill. We are not suppose to deduct year end goodwill from the calculation of goodwill, is not it?
The question says: Sales from Sophistic to Pedantic in the post acquisition period were $8 million. Sophistic made a mark up on cost of 40% on these sales.Pedantic had sold $5路2 million (at cost to Pedantic) of these goods by 30 September 2008.
So, when subsidiary is selling to parent, the we deduct the ‘pup’ from NCI for working 4A (nci 40%)? Is it?
Yes – the unrealised profit is $800,000 and should be deducted from the Sophistic retained earnings “today” in your calculation to arrive at the Sophistic post-acquisition retained earnings. That’s the bottom figure in working W3 and it’s that figure that we use when calculating the nci share of post acquisition retained earnings in the subsidiary.
So, you see, the nci is charged with their share of the pup as a result of deducting it from subsidiary retained earnings
I still don’t understand where the figures are coming from 馃檨
@alextrunghuynh, In a situation where Steve Scott tells you the value of the goodwill attributable to the nci, you still need to calculate the value of the nci INVESTMENT.
The way to do this is to realise that the nci investment is equal to their proportional share of the S fair valued net assets at date of acquisition + the goodwill attributable to them
So, for example, ( 30% x FV of SNA @ DOA ) plus the 1.5 million
The question tells us that the GOODWILL attributable to the nci is $1.5m but we need to know the value of the nci INVESTMENT
The nci investment is equal to the combination of their share of the fair value of the subsidiary’s net assets at date of acquisition plus any goodwill attributable to the nci.
I recorded these answers using the Kaplan revision kit as the source of the question. Because Kaplan are not platinum providers, they are not allowed to reproduce the ACCA questions verbatim.
It could be that this explains the apparent magic with which my figures have appeared.
If by any chance this does not explain the anomaly, then post again
@alextrunghuynh, In a situation where Steve Scott tells you the value of the goodwill attributable to the nci, you still need to calculate the value of the nci INVESTMENT.
The way to do this is to realise that the nci investment is equal to their proportional share of the S fair valued net assets at date of acquisition + the goodwill attributable to them
So, for example, ( 30% x FV of SNA @ DOA ) plus the 1.5 million
boysbv says
Hi Sir, I’m having a problem to understand what was done in current assets concerning cash in transit. I understood why we neet to add 200,000 as this refers to increase in cash (making as if the other company has already received the cash). We will also need to lower 600,000 to 400,000. But i don’t understand why you have subtracted 200,000 again as you already put 400k instead of 600k.
Thanks for your time and consideration
afia01 says
Respected Sir,
I have a question regarding Pedantic. Basically, in my Kaplan Exam kit there is a note(v):
“Pedantic has a policy of accounting for any non-controlling interest at fair value. The fair value of non-controlling interest at the acquisition date was $5.9 million. Consolidated goodwill was impaired by $1 million at 30 September 2008. ”
In the answer they have deducted the goodwill impairment of $1 million from the calculation of goodwill. We are not suppose to deduct year end goodwill from the calculation of goodwill, is not it?
Thank you
Kor says
Did Sir,
How did you calculate share issue of 16,000.
Thank you!
MikeLittle says
I think that you mean 1,600 not 16,000!
60% * 4,000 acquired / 3 * 2 are the number of shares issued on the acquisition of Sophistic and that calculates out to 1,600
Ok?
Swati says
Dear Sir,
F7 December 2008 Question 1 Pedantic:
I am a bit confused with Working 4A for NCI (40%). Do we not deduct the 40% of pup from here? why?
And when do we deduct it from NCI?
Thanks..
MikeLittle says
Without me looking up the question, let me ask first of all “Which company made the sale?”
If the answer is Pedantic, then the adjustment is in Pedantic’s records / retained earnings so will have no affect on the entitlement of the nci
If it wasn’t Pedantic that made the sale, please post again and I’ll check out the question
OK?
Swati says
Dear Sir,
The question says: Sales from Sophistic to Pedantic in the post acquisition period were $8 million. Sophistic made a mark up on cost of 40% on these sales.Pedantic had sold $5路2 million (at cost to Pedantic) of these goods by 30 September 2008.
So, when subsidiary is selling to parent, the we deduct the ‘pup’ from NCI for working 4A (nci 40%)? Is it?
Swati.
MikeLittle says
Yes – the unrealised profit is $800,000 and should be deducted from the Sophistic retained earnings “today” in your calculation to arrive at the Sophistic post-acquisition retained earnings. That’s the bottom figure in working W3 and it’s that figure that we use when calculating the nci share of post acquisition retained earnings in the subsidiary.
So, you see, the nci is charged with their share of the pup as a result of deducting it from subsidiary retained earnings
OK?
olghi1986 says
Thank you! Very useful!
ppatterson says
Under the heading F V of N A @ DOA, not sure how the figure for – retained earnings b/fwd (3,500) was arrived at.
MikeLittle says
I don’t have the question in front of me but is it not retained earnings at the end of the year – the retained earnings this year?
merotchi says
I am sorry Mike, but I am still not sure how the 3500 came about?
MikeLittle says
Retained earnings from the question at the end of the year are 6,500. Profit for the year, from the question, is 3,000
Therefore retained earnings brought forward must be 3,500 which when this year’s retained earnings are added on to that figure gives us 6,500.
Therefore retained earnings brought forward must be that 3,500
merotchi says
Just Figured it out with a bit of help! – RE 6500 – 3000 Profit x 6/12 because its for half the year only!
Thank you Ever so much Mr Little!
MikeLittle says
You’re welcome
drishti1234 says
But sir, in answers retained earnings at DOA is 5000.
How?
MikeLittle says
Within the first 4 minutes of the recording … there’s your answer!
OK?
aine5 says
I still don’t understand where the figures are coming from 馃檨
@alextrunghuynh, In a situation where Steve Scott tells you the value of the goodwill attributable to the nci, you still need to calculate the value of the nci INVESTMENT.
The way to do this is to realise that the nci investment is equal to their proportional share of the S fair valued net assets at date of acquisition + the goodwill attributable to them
So, for example, ( 30% x FV of SNA @ DOA ) plus the 1.5 million
OK?
MikeLittle says
Aine5
What is it that you don’t understand?
jodiann says
how did you get 5.9 for the nci in pedantic
MikeLittle says
The question tells us that the GOODWILL attributable to the nci is $1.5m but we need to know the value of the nci INVESTMENT
The nci investment is equal to the combination of their share of the fair value of the subsidiary’s net assets at date of acquisition plus any goodwill attributable to the nci.
The fair value of S net assets is represented by:
Shares 4,000
Retained earnings brought forward 3,500
Retained earnings 6 months 1,500
Fair value adjustment 2,000
Total 11,000
Nci share 40% x $11,000 4,400
Attributable goodwill per the question 1,500
Nci investment 5,900
OK?
aine5 says
I cant figure out where the NCI of $15.5 is coming from??
aine5 says
Sorry its $5.9m
MikeLittle says
I recorded these answers using the Kaplan revision kit as the source of the question. Because Kaplan are not platinum providers, they are not allowed to reproduce the ACCA questions verbatim.
It could be that this explains the apparent magic with which my figures have appeared.
If by any chance this does not explain the anomaly, then post again
MikeLittle says
But 5.9 is explained in the posts just below this string
sueellen says
i was wondering the same thing Alex. I’m still confused by it and trying to work it out.
unknown008 says
@sueellen, The $5.9M is the FV of the NCI at acquisition mentioned in note 5 of the question.
alextrunghuynh says
Where is the value of NCI $5.9M in the question? It only says goodwill attributable to NCI $1.5M.
MikeLittle says
@alextrunghuynh, In a situation where Steve Scott tells you the value of the goodwill attributable to the nci, you still need to calculate the value of the nci INVESTMENT.
The way to do this is to realise that the nci investment is equal to their proportional share of the S fair valued net assets at date of acquisition + the goodwill attributable to them
So, for example, ( 30% x FV of SNA @ DOA ) plus the 1.5 million
OK?
lovemapu says
thank you