• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Tan

Profile picture of Tan
Active 6 years ago
  • Topics: 19
  • Replies: 18
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 4, 2017 at 4:14 pm #400408
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi, are you willing to share the soft copy of “Mock Exam section” in BPP Revision Kit Sept 2017 to me?

    As I only have the old version (June 2017).

    August 4, 2017 at 3:56 pm #400405
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi Heavens0touch, can you share the soft copy of “Mock Exam section” in BPP Revision Kit Sept 2017 to me?

    As I only have the old version (June 2017).

    July 17, 2017 at 1:46 am #396641
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Get 47 for 2nd attempt, sad…….Any retaker for September 2017? I am thinking to go for Sep or Dec sitting.

    May 24, 2017 at 2:24 am #387695
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks Ken. Sir, may I know what do you mean by “emission could be completely, avoided simply by producing nothing?”?

    May 23, 2017 at 7:17 pm #387652
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks Ken!

    Ken, I would like to ask question 3 (a) from Dec 2014. From the sample answer for Plan 2, the examiner calculate the % reduction in CO2 emission using “total CO2 emission divided by the total power output”.

    I was wondering why is not using % changes of total CO2 emissions to calculate the % reduction, i.e. 26.51 (existing plan) minus 22.68 (plan 1a + plan 2) and divided by 26.51, which is 14.4% reduction, which do not reach the government’s target.

    May 17, 2017 at 4:51 pm #386690
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi sir, regarding to Query 1, the new contribution per unit of $51.9 is derived from [75 – 21 – (21 x 10%)].

    The audit cost and marketing campaigns are not included, right?

    May 15, 2017 at 9:37 am #386246
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi Sir, one more question for Q1(iii).
    Sir, may I know how to get this figure $71m from the sample answer?

    May 15, 2017 at 6:15 am #386195
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks a lot Sir!

    May 15, 2017 at 6:14 am #386194
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thank u Sir

    May 12, 2017 at 6:47 pm #386004
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thank you so much Sir, u help me a lot!!

    May 10, 2017 at 5:46 pm #385633
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks a lot sir!

    May 9, 2017 at 7:00 pm #385525
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks Sir!

    May 7, 2017 at 3:50 pm #385212
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi Ken, for March/June 2016 Q1 (iii), can you explain the sample answer in another way? Because i could not really understand it……..

    May 3, 2017 at 9:26 am #384679
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Thanks a lot Ken ?

    May 3, 2017 at 7:35 am #384670
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi Ken, for Dec 16 Q2 (a), for the exchange rate, is it correct to get 6.67% by using 0.1/1.5?
    Is this the correct concept?

    March 2, 2017 at 3:30 am #375041
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    @kengarrett said:
    I think it was from around December 2010.

    Thanks Ken! Sir, I heard that the examiner has changed since June 2016, is that true?

    October 25, 2016 at 2:14 pm #345965
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    Hi, anyone know do we need to pay extra charges for deferring this coming December 2016 exam?

    October 21, 2015 at 7:48 am #277991
    mysteryTan
    Member
    • Topics: 19
    • Replies: 18
    • ☆

    @mash88 said:
    Hi all,

    Does this include the ISA;s as well?

    Thanks.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in