Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › *** F9 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 735 replies, 152 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by arslan14.
- AuthorPosts
- June 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm #253856
I dont think they required us to calculate three npvs in last question. It was an exam, and also, calculating even one npv is a lengthy task
June 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm #253857What about the rate question 16 or 17?
Which answer did you get?June 5, 2015 at 5:27 pm #253858@mfc2476 said:
was there a Q on checks for credit worthiness of potential customers to be given credit?yah i wrote trade references , bank references , business rating according to credit rating bodies , it was 3 marks worth part i think.
June 5, 2015 at 5:29 pm #253865Money market deposists are loans, but they are not loans between banks. They mention libor in this case. Money deposists are loans between banks and depositors, not between banks
June 5, 2015 at 5:29 pm #253866but yeah i messed up depreciation calculation for the fifth question :C
June 5, 2015 at 5:29 pm #253867AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 7
- ☆
I guess only 2 and three were correct.2 for sure was correct and 3 merchant bank….not so sure
June 5, 2015 at 5:30 pm #253872please tell me those mistakes are worth 1 mark and i can still pass :”(
June 5, 2015 at 5:32 pm #253874Venture capital organization is financial intermediary
June 5, 2015 at 5:33 pm #253876Fahad, i have just looked through tanamu co, in bpp revision kit, but man, that question is very different
June 5, 2015 at 5:35 pm #253881Guys, what about mcqs on market segmentation theory and zero beta of debt? Money market deposits?
June 5, 2015 at 5:36 pm #253884@emo777 said:
Fahad, i have just looked through tanamu co, in bpp revision kit, but man, that question is very differentswap the sales unit with sales revenue , what else is different ?
June 5, 2015 at 5:38 pm #253888Fahad, our question did not have part B as a calculation 😉 also, in the answer, they calculate expected value of nov 😉 other cases are just shown as an illustration
June 5, 2015 at 5:42 pm #253895mcq was disaster! 🙁
June 5, 2015 at 5:43 pm #253899@shuvo016 said:
mcq was disaster! 🙁More then that I will probably fail because of it 🙁
June 5, 2015 at 5:43 pm #253900Mcqs should be discussed more, as they are the only way for us to pass, considering open questions
June 5, 2015 at 5:44 pm #253902There was a point in mcq, where they claimed that borrower can buy futures and then sell them, it was false, am i right?
June 5, 2015 at 5:45 pm #253904Does that mean we would have had to inflate the selling three different times inorder to calculate 3 NPVs? All for 8 marks?
I don’t think so
June 5, 2015 at 5:46 pm #253907Well, that wasn’t quite what I was expecting! I thought Section B was very fair but the MCQs – my god, in all the millions of practice ones I did – none were like that.
Instead of covering the rest of the syllabus they seemed to focus solely on markets etc. Think I’ve done far worse on the MCQs than I expected but better on Section B.
Can anyone let me know what on earth the answer to the MCQ with the fx rates was? Could not figure that out to save my life!
June 5, 2015 at 5:46 pm #253909@emo777 said:
There was a point in mcq, where they claimed that borrower can buy futures and then sell them, it was false, am i right?I think I answered that all 3 are correct 🙁
June 5, 2015 at 5:46 pm #253910Olanrewaju, totally agree with you!
June 5, 2015 at 5:47 pm #253912@emo777 said:
There was a point in mcq, where they claimed that borrower can buy futures and then sell them, it was false, am i right?Can’t remember the whole question but you’re right – borrows sell futures then buy to close out.
June 5, 2015 at 5:47 pm #253915You cant buy futures and then sell them lol 😀
June 5, 2015 at 5:48 pm #25391829.00 in current term 🙂
June 5, 2015 at 5:49 pm #253919@afuyegallas said:
Does that mean we would have had to inflate the selling three different times inorder to calculate 3 NPVs? All for 8 marks?I don’t think so
No, we had to calculate the EV of selling price which was $29 then inflate that and the fixed costs – but not variable costs which seemed strange.
The only other possible snags in Q5 were tax being paid in the year rather than I year in arrears and TAD on a straight line basis – so no balancing allowance in the final year needed.
June 5, 2015 at 5:50 pm #253920What about beta of debt and market segmentation?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.