- This topic has 735 replies, 152 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by
.
- Posts
MCQ’s I thought were ridiculously hard. I didn’t cover the syllabus well enough.
Q4 I messed up, the others were okay though.Whether I pass is how good my guessing has been on MCQ’s
@dushyan07 said:
anyone got like $ 4,000,000+ NPV?? positivesomething around?
I got 3900 something, think I messed my sales up.
FRA better by 700 got 310,000 something.
Factoring was worthwhile, big saving on finance cost as well as bad debts and admin.
@emo777 said:
I got a benefit of 87000 smth, so the option was viableI got around that!
F7 on weds was a walk In the park compared to this!Didn’t write anything hardly though, was in panic mode at that point.
Sensitivity analysis what did you write
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
The paper was seriously too long
YES I GOT THAT IT WASNT VIABLE
IT WAS GOIN TO COST OVER A MILLION FOR THEM TO DO IT
Sensitinity analysis wrote the definition and coupe of point on uncertainty and risk
So, my answers:
Question 1: accept forward, both of them were 310000 and smth, the difference was very small thought.
Question 2: using dividend, price was 9.71; using yield, price was 10.5 or smth like that
Question 3: factor was viable, benefit of 87000 and smth
Question 4 : my working were good, although i forgot to divide new earnings by increased number of shares, that was my only mistake
Question 5: npv was positive
I just went on about how it varies between sales I.e if less than 5% really concerning! need to ensure accuracy and how they can use it efficiently etc, seemed a lot to write for 6 marks
James, on sensitivty, i just gave its definition 😀 thats what they asked 😀
For the company it would cost over a million to do it.messed up the finance saving of the factor though. Took the receivables the company x 80 x 9 and x20 x 7
@emo777 said:
So, my answers:Question 1: accept forward, both of them were 310000 and smth, the difference was very small thought.
Question 2: using dividend, price was 9.71; using yield, price was 10.5 or smth like that
Question 3: factor was viable, benefit of 87000 and smth
Question 4 : my working were good, although i forgot to divide new earnings by increased number of shares, that was my only mistake
Question 5: npv was positive
Seems as though you’ve got it!
Q1 I got 310,000 something and explained pros and cons of FRA
Q2… Went a little wrong hopefully get method marks, what about explanation?
Q3: 87,000 seems right I think,
Q4: didn’t really understand, blagged a few calc marks, what about explanation of capital structure?
Q5: NPV of 3900 something, explained sensitivity analysisGuys, the option was viable, i am quite sure, the saving was of 87000 and smth, the same question from bpp revision kit
Question 4 : my working were good, although i forgot to divide new earnings by increased number of shares, that was my only mistake
new earnings?? weren’t the proceeds of rights issue used to redeem the loan, therefore earnings remained the same, only the number of shares increased??
guys can someone tell wat to do for that 3rd question??
i felt it a bit difficult
i got benifit
but it was more than 100000James, just explained dividen model in general and wrote that they used other company’s earning yield instead of theirs, as the company was listed as well
Bro, they took this question exactly from bpp revision kit)) i worked on this type of questions a lot. As your interest will be saved, your earning will change
Such as how it’s accurate etc?
My theory isn’t brilliant, struggled to cover the syllabus well enough.What you think of MCQ?
James, regarding explanation of right issue, i didnt understand, although i wrote the cases when shaReholder buy right, sell rights or do nothing
the total expected SPwas 29 but you still had to calculate separate for the weak and strong economy and after that comment as well, i remember doing a similar question from past papers as well because that total expected expected SP is unrealistic
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.