• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

CHAPTER 3 EXAMPLE 3

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › CHAPTER 3 EXAMPLE 3

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by tinaboy.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 20, 2016 at 10:35 pm #307183
    tinaboy
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 126
    • ☆☆

    Hie Mike,

    would you please explain for me what is “their share of D`s investment in V” under the calculation on the value of V(NCI).THANKS

    March 21, 2016 at 9:06 am #307211
    gerberer2
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi Mike,

    Further to the above, could you please explain when the FV of the NCI at the DOA is used when calculating goodwill for the second company? In questions 1 & 2 it hasn’t been included, but in question 3, it has. Why is this? Thanks.

    March 21, 2016 at 7:09 pm #307258
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    The parent owns 80% of S and S owns 60% of SS, therefore P has an effective controlling interest of 48% (80% x 60%) and effective NCI of 52%.

    The info in the question gives the fair value of this NCI when it is referring to their share of D’s investment in V.

    The date of acquisition of SS is when the parent gains control which is 1 September 2005. If the two subsidiaries combine at an earlier date we ignore this date as the parent would not have had control. In the previous examples the two subsidiaries didn’t combine at an earlier date and so we do not ignore that date. That is the acquisition date as the parent gained control of the sub-sub at that date.

    I hope that answers the two questions.

    Thanks

    March 21, 2016 at 7:14 pm #307259
    tinaboy
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 126
    • ☆☆

    Absolutely it does . I have also learnt that this share of S in SS can be deducted anywhere from either SS and S.You made it very clear in example 4. Thanks again

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Goodness on Accruals and Prepayments (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • mrjonbain on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • sadik.sadka on How to make the best use of OpenTuition
  • SONIC916 on Lessee accounting – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in