• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

CHAPTER 3 EXAMPLE 3

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › CHAPTER 3 EXAMPLE 3

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by Avatartinaboy.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 20, 2016 at 10:35 pm #307183
    Avatartinaboy
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 126
    • ☆☆

    Hie Mike,

    would you please explain for me what is “their share of D`s investment in V” under the calculation on the value of V(NCI).THANKS

    March 21, 2016 at 9:06 am #307211
    Avatargerberer2
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi Mike,

    Further to the above, could you please explain when the FV of the NCI at the DOA is used when calculating goodwill for the second company? In questions 1 & 2 it hasn’t been included, but in question 3, it has. Why is this? Thanks.

    March 21, 2016 at 7:09 pm #307258
    AvatarP2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7232
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    The parent owns 80% of S and S owns 60% of SS, therefore P has an effective controlling interest of 48% (80% x 60%) and effective NCI of 52%.

    The info in the question gives the fair value of this NCI when it is referring to their share of D’s investment in V.

    The date of acquisition of SS is when the parent gains control which is 1 September 2005. If the two subsidiaries combine at an earlier date we ignore this date as the parent would not have had control. In the previous examples the two subsidiaries didn’t combine at an earlier date and so we do not ignore that date. That is the acquisition date as the parent gained control of the sub-sub at that date.

    I hope that answers the two questions.

    Thanks

    March 21, 2016 at 7:14 pm #307259
    Avatartinaboy
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 126
    • ☆☆

    Absolutely it does . I have also learnt that this share of S in SS can be deducted anywhere from either SS and S.You made it very clear in example 4. Thanks again

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Princek23 on FR Revision Mock Exam
  • AllisonHoang on Sources of data – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in