Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- February 6, 2018 at 3:57 pm #435496
Sir is the project sponsor and benefit owner same? If not then ehat are the differences?
February 4, 2018 at 1:18 pm #435045Sir I understand that the company will have spare capacity when A and C are subcontracted. I’m just asking what will happen to the demand when A and C products are outsourced?
January 27, 2018 at 1:46 pm #433428Sir in b ii, how did the examiner came up with 300000 tonnes for the next three years?
January 21, 2018 at 5:56 am #431738Sir, how is the Roce calculated? The formula is Pbit /capital employed. But how is the capital employed calculated?
January 13, 2018 at 6:26 am #428814Thank you so much sir. I am sitting for March 2018, are there any changes in the syllabus?
January 4, 2018 at 2:43 pm #426914Hi! In a,procurement,why aren’t JCD benefiting from long establised suppliers? JCD have been purchasing their woods since its first year, which means JCD will be valueable to its suppliers.
January 1, 2018 at 6:54 am #426915In procurement, why isn’t jcd benefitting from its suppliers?Having long established suppliers means, JCD will be valuable for them as it has worked with them since its first year.
December 27, 2017 at 5:08 pm #424933Hi in this question b , why Tmp must adopt differential pricing and why does it need to be aware of Amazon?
December 14, 2017 at 7:21 am #423161Hello. One more thing, how to calculate 291,281 & 271?
September 6, 2017 at 1:44 pm #406020Hi John. This is Dec 95 question. The title is Daron. In appendix 1, 20X9-Y3 annuity calculation is done by takin PV of 5 years @ 13% and AF of 5 years @ 13%.
But in Arbore (Dec 2012),when calculating the npv ko Pduro 5 why 7.191 is taken? Why the PV of 4 years and AF of 10years (4 – 15 years) @ 11% discount rate is not taken?September 4, 2017 at 11:18 am #405299Hi John. When calculating the tax shield why PV is calculated instead of annuity?
September 3, 2017 at 8:26 am #405099Hi John. I didn’t understand the appendix 4: value created for vco.
1)Vco has paid $400m for 600m shares so its share proportion will increase but how is vco equity share proportion increased to 40%?2)50% * 18458. Why 50% is multiplied?
3)why is the value of unsecured bonds taken into account when it has been replaced by 600m shares?
4) why only vco value of equity taken into account and not other shareholders?
August 30, 2017 at 7:33 pm #404470Hi John.
Why is the borrowing cost 136000 instead of 867000? Is it ok if I take 867000 borrowing cost in the exam?August 29, 2017 at 5:26 am #403988Hi John.
In d, how did they calculate 300000 and 450000 shares? Why that isn’t acceptable to managers?August 27, 2017 at 8:54 am #403724Hi John. In this question the tax allowable depreciation isn’t added back but in Limmi co ( c) (June 2013) the tax allowable depreciation haa been added back. Why is that?
August 25, 2017 at 6:53 am #403405Hi John.
The ques says that awan is receiving 48 m on 1 feb. The FRA is 4.82%. When the rate increases to 4.99%, this means that awan could receive more at 4.99% but it can only get 4.82%.So awan suffered a loss of 0.17% which is why he will have to make a payment to Voklava bank.
When the rate decreases to 3.19%, there is a gain of 1.63 for awan because it will now rec at 4.82% than 3.19%(which is low). So this time, awan will rec gain from the bank.
Please tell me whether I’ve understood the concept.What would be if this was a payment case instead of receipt?
August 24, 2017 at 5:41 pm #403366Thank you for the reply but i dont get where $13417 has already been discounted. After 4 years it will go to perpetuity so for that dont we need to discount $13417 like in other M/A questions?If not then ,why? Please do explain me in detail so that I can understand.
August 24, 2017 at 11:09 am #403299Hi. In c I, why will npv fall by $ 2m to 13.893m? In the calculation below, why are they doing 180(1+x)^2 and so on?
August 21, 2017 at 6:23 pm #402817Hi
In c, how do we calculate 5.70 and 6.20?August 21, 2017 at 6:02 pm #402813Hi
In b how do we calculate 250000??August 21, 2017 at 5:32 pm #402806Hi
In b how did they calculate £1.5m and £1.8m.?August 21, 2017 at 3:32 pm #402788Hi! How is 3.76 1/4% calculated?
August 19, 2017 at 4:00 pm #402490I’m using kaplan kit and it says that Apv isn’t appropriate. Please explain me the reasonable answer to write in the exam.
And do you have lectures about warrants?August 19, 2017 at 2:17 pm #402478Hi John
Why do we have to take 65000 in the first year and not 16m (12+4) as these are the funds that bank will lend? The question also says that Tyche MV is 81m if proteus cancels its current loan. What does this mean?August 19, 2017 at 11:13 am #402450Hi John,
In b why Apv isn’t appropriate for kilenc? If it wants to set up a subsidiary company in lanosia, it’s capital structure will definitely change so Apv would be better. Isn’t it? - AuthorPosts