• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

ACCA P4 Tramont Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › ACCA P4 Tramont Co

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 19, 2016 at 10:30 pm #350080
    Avatarvasvi
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    In foreign subsidy, if there are inter-company sales involved from parent to subsidy, profit of the parent co. is added before tax applicable at home rate.

    This question mentioned contribution but not profit, is that the reason its not been added back before applying tax at home?

    November 20, 2016 at 7:55 am #350116
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54836
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    But is had been added back – see workings 7. The figures brought in for the contribution are after accounting for the tax on it.

    (I am puzzled why you should think that it being contribution and not profit should make any difference – contribution is profit before fixed overheads, and since the fixed overheads aren’t changing, the extra contribution is the extra profit!!)

    September 4, 2017 at 11:18 am #405299
    Avatarparisnaaa
    Member
    • Topics: 32
    • Replies: 92
    • ☆☆

    Hi John. When calculating the tax shield why PV is calculated instead of annuity?

    September 4, 2017 at 12:14 pm #405316
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54836
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    We always calculate the PV !!

    You can only use annuity factors to calculate the PV when it is an equal cash flow each year. However here, after converting to $’s, the cash flow is not equal each year and therefore you have to calculate the PV for each year separately.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘ACCA P4 Tramont Co’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • jessejames on Audit Evidence – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Princek23 on FR Revision Mock Exam
  • AllisonHoang on Sources of data – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in