• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 36 Example

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 36 Example

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by hemraj123.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 13, 2017 at 2:16 pm #378038
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir, the example says that some of the plant and equipment was destroyes which had a carying value of 1.2m. Then shouldn’t we divide the 3.1m of impairment between 6m (Building) and 4m (remaining plant and equipment)?

    Thanks

    March 19, 2017 at 8:26 am #378675
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    No, as the plant has already suffered the impairment of $1.2 million then it cannot be impaired any further as it is now held at its recoverable amount.

    Thanks

    March 19, 2017 at 8:46 am #378686
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    Yes, but the question says, ” The fire destroyed some plant and equipment with a carrying value of $1.2 million and there was no option but to scrap it.”

    So I would assume that out of the total plant with the carrying value of $5,200, $1,200 has been completely written off and thus the remaining plant will be $4,000.

    According to the notes, impairment will be allocated to:-

    1) Specific assets,
    2) Goodwill, and finally
    3) Remaining assets (pro-rata basis)

    So, in that case, won’t the remaining plant be impaired according to pro-rata bases?

    Thanks

    March 20, 2017 at 9:39 pm #378819
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No! As I said, once it has already been impaired it cannot be impaired any further. There is no damage to the rest of the plant, so it is not adjusted any further.

    Thanks

    March 22, 2017 at 7:22 am #378905
    hemraj123
    Member
    • Topics: 110
    • Replies: 188
    • ☆☆☆

    Thank you sir

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Ken Garrett on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • John Moffat on AA Chapter 7 Questions
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 12 Questions Sales Tax

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in