- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by .
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 36 Example
Sir, the example says that some of the plant and equipment was destroyes which had a carying value of 1.2m. Then shouldn’t we divide the 3.1m of impairment between 6m (Building) and 4m (remaining plant and equipment)?
Thanks
Hi,
No, as the plant has already suffered the impairment of $1.2 million then it cannot be impaired any further as it is now held at its recoverable amount.
Thanks
Yes, but the question says, ” The fire destroyed some plant and equipment with a carrying value of $1.2 million and there was no option but to scrap it.”
So I would assume that out of the total plant with the carrying value of $5,200, $1,200 has been completely written off and thus the remaining plant will be $4,000.
According to the notes, impairment will be allocated to:-
1) Specific assets,
2) Goodwill, and finally
3) Remaining assets (pro-rata basis)
So, in that case, won’t the remaining plant be impaired according to pro-rata bases?
Thanks
No! As I said, once it has already been impaired it cannot be impaired any further. There is no damage to the rest of the plant, so it is not adjusted any further.
Thanks
Thank you sir
