Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › *** F9 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 735 replies, 152 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by arslan14.
- AuthorPosts
- June 5, 2015 at 4:39 pm #253719
Fahad, agree, but this question was a little bit different. They just asked you to calculate one npv, not several npvs in different conditions
June 5, 2015 at 4:40 pm #253720Q20 of MCQ, I think I remember getting $2.10?
June 5, 2015 at 4:40 pm #253721what did you guys put for the MCQ on the asset beta? something like 8.8%? i think i got C..
June 5, 2015 at 4:40 pm #253722Also, it was unrealistic for them to ask us calculate 3 npvs during exam
June 5, 2015 at 4:40 pm #253723How did you guys work out Kd? With the 0.40 div payout etc?
The multiple choice q’s were so hard!June 5, 2015 at 4:41 pm #253724Yeah, 2.10 ans 8.8%
June 5, 2015 at 4:41 pm #2537258.8% is D
June 5, 2015 at 4:41 pm #253726Yes 8.8%
June 5, 2015 at 4:42 pm #2537278.8% cost of capital?
4% growth rate.June 5, 2015 at 4:42 pm #253729James, in question 2, where you had 40 percent and etc, you just multiple payout ratio by earnings to find out the dividends, and then you can find the growth of dividends for one year, to use it in the formula
June 5, 2015 at 4:43 pm #253730what were your business values using the two methods?
June 5, 2015 at 4:44 pm #253733I think my growth rate was 3.85% in question 2, maybe i mess up now 😀
June 5, 2015 at 4:44 pm #253734@emo777 said:
Fahad, agree, but this question was a little bit different. They just asked you to calculate one npv, not several npvs in different conditionsyes but considering for 9 marks one npv was not enough i believe
and how did you get that factoring question to be viable choice? the charge of factor i.e 0.75% of sales i think far exceeded the benefits !!! or did i as usual failed to read question properly :C
June 5, 2015 at 4:44 pm #2537359.71 and 10.5
June 5, 2015 at 4:45 pm #253736Got the same thing
June 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm #253738Maybe : as costs, you had the factor fee and finance charge on advances. As savings, you had decrease in finance costs, saving in bad debts and admin costs
June 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm #253739I got 3.85 aswell i think defo got 9.71 as the value anyway 😀
June 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm #253740Can anybody remember what this npv on q5 , I had 39….. Something . And tax liability I started from 1st yr. nd tax got fix figure of 375 ?
June 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm #253741As me? 😀
June 5, 2015 at 4:46 pm #253742But npv alone is 9 marks mate
June 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm #253743Good 😉
June 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm #253744@emo777 said:
Also, it was unrealistic for them to ask us calculate 3 npvs during examgo through the bpp kit they have calculated 3 npvs 🙂 btw you only had to do 2 additional workings but thats my opinion.
June 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm #253745– how about the mcq on the BAUMOL MODEL? it ranged from like 40k-60k..
– MCQ on transaction risk, i got something like B/C not sure which one unless someone can remind me of the value.. i did the difference of the 2 percentages and it came out as one of the answers..
June 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm #253746NPV I got 4mil
Sensitivity just recited the definition of risk/uncertainty etcJune 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm #253747what did you do get the business valuations?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.