Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › *** F9 June 2015 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 735 replies, 152 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by arslan14.
- AuthorPosts
- June 5, 2015 at 8:36 pm #254194
Hey guys, any sort of reply appreciated
for q1 I wrote so much. A page of calcs explaining and a page of info. Just hope it’s enough.Didn’t like q2= think I got the theory but ok though
Q3 the factor. I said that they would be losing 33% of their income with costs from factor and that if they focused on negotiation with customers stating they need to talk credit days. Talked about the need for business to get receivables days down from 60 to 40.
Question 4 – honestly didn’t mind this question.the only thing I didn’t do was compare both situations. (I calculated the share rights issue and the calcs but didn’t compare to not)
However I used a lot of expinaitiom (1page to explain. Capital structure. Talked traditional view, Miller and modigliani etc)Hated Q5. Calcs are completely wrong. Lots of theory again. With the mcqs being a joke (imo) and this being a resist I just HOPE I pass. Honestly. Head is fried.
Any sort of reply etc would be cool
Thanks
MichaelJune 5, 2015 at 8:40 pm #254197@emo777 said:
But why and how did you get 19k net cost?I can’t remember the figures now. I suggest we wait till john puts up his answers
June 5, 2015 at 8:43 pm #254200AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Yes…after adjusting probabilities it was 29 with current inflation rate of 4 percent
June 5, 2015 at 8:49 pm #254203Yes i got 4.36m or so….
June 5, 2015 at 8:54 pm #254208@emo777 said:
I think you messed up with 5% premium 😀 i think it was given to mislead us. The thing you had to do is to multiply net cash raised after issue costs by 100 and then divide by 104 to find the nominal value of loan to be redeemed. The you calculate the saving on interest. They took it from bpp revision kit, and you need premium only for calculation of cost of redeemable debt, which was not relevant in this case.The premium was relevant! There was a clause in the question that the bondholders would only allow them redeem the bonds before maturity if they can pay a premium of 5% to the market value.
$11,200 – the issue costs gave us the net amount remaining to use for the redemption.
The next step was to calculate the MV of the loan by multiplying the nominal value by 104/100. Then you must add the premium.
The next step is to deduce the nominal amount of the bonds redeemed. And this is calculated by subtracting the net proceeds of the issue from the MV(with the premium) and multiplying the result by 100/104.
I got that 9,000,000 was the nominal value of the bond that was redeemed, leaving 21,000,000.
June 5, 2015 at 9:03 pm #254211It was extremely hard
June 5, 2015 at 9:05 pm #254213On the Question 5, it said variable costs were on nominal values, does it mean that we put the costs as they were, or we had to use the general rate of inflation , 4%??
June 5, 2015 at 9:10 pm #254215In the receivables question did anyone get a benefit??
June 5, 2015 at 9:24 pm #254217Hey guys. I’m new here. Will Mr. Moffat be able to post his answers of the MCQ for us or no ?
Re Q5 – I used only VC @ inflation rate of 10%. Is that incorrect ? and did we have to do 3 NPVs I hear ? 🙁
Thanks in advance
June 5, 2015 at 9:28 pm #254218Sorry I am new here. What is the name of F9 lecturer Mr. Moffat ?
Who is John ? and after how many days after the exam does he usually upload his answers.
Thanks in advance
June 5, 2015 at 9:35 pm #254219mcqs was really hard
June 5, 2015 at 10:13 pm #254223AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
@alanacca said:
Sorry I am new here. What is the name of F9 lecturer Mr. Moffat ?Who is John ? and after how many days after the exam does he usually upload his answers.
Thanks in advance
ACCA did not publish questions immediately… last year It took time.
June 5, 2015 at 10:35 pm #254227Hey Guys, I calculated the selling price wrong for 5th Question Of F9 exam today. Will I get any marks for rest of the calculations I did ?
June 5, 2015 at 10:46 pm #254230AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
I tried my best to answer all the multiple questions and of section B questions correctly and attempted 100% paper. I am still not sure that i could get 50 marks out of it. I think the paper was very conceptual. Lets hope for best and Good luck for every one.
June 5, 2015 at 10:46 pm #254231AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
yes
June 5, 2015 at 11:08 pm #254244F9 Question 5 – I calculated the selling price wrong. Will I get any other marks for rest of the calculation ? Please help!
June 5, 2015 at 11:09 pm #254246@afuyegallas said:
The premium was relevant! There was a clause in the question that the bondholders would only allow them redeem the bonds before maturity if they can pay a premium of 5% to the market value.$11,200 – the issue costs gave us the net amount remaining to use for the redemption.
The next step was to calculate the MV of the loan by multiplying the nominal value by 104/100. Then you must add the premium.
The next step is to deduce the nominal amount of the bonds redeemed. And this is calculated by subtracting the net proceeds of the issue from the MV(with the premium) and multiplying the result by 100/104.
I got that 9,000,000 was the nominal value of the bond that was redeemed, leaving 21,000,000.
I thought it should be 105/100? May be am wrong
June 5, 2015 at 11:10 pm #254247@emo777 said:
1) all three choices were financial intermediaries
2) factoring improves efficiency of trade receivables management in a company
3 market segmentation explains kinks in yield curves
4) money deposits are short term loans between banks, and this option was wrong
5) beta of debt understates financial risk, this was also wrong
6) borrowers buy futures and sell them later, this option was wrong
7) share options always reward good performance, this option was also wring
8) expected net present values are used for projects with several outcomes ONCE, this was incorrect as we know that expected values fo occur during many times, not just once4….the question said short term loans SUCH as banks
So this was correct
June 5, 2015 at 11:18 pm #254248F9 Question 5 – I calculated the selling price wrong. Will I get any other marks for rest of the calculation ? Please help!
June 5, 2015 at 11:44 pm #254252AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 171
- ☆☆
yes you will. They will penalise you once for that error but mark your subsequent steps
June 6, 2015 at 12:42 am #254256What did you get for q17 McQueen. The 1000 euro to dollar for 12 mths . It was a confusing and stupid question
June 6, 2015 at 12:46 am #254257I agree the Mcqs were terrible, some of the calcs work involved was crazy and all the definitions were so confusing
Q17 was the worst
June 6, 2015 at 12:53 am #254258Agree totally . no Wacc and no capm is crazy,
June 6, 2015 at 1:02 am #254259AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
i think the mcq were just too much. In the time allocated it was impossible to focus properly on anything. It totally threw you off. After dealing with part 1 , then question 2 and 4 in part 2…impossible to finish this paper without making many errors. too many complicated questions , not enough balance.
June 6, 2015 at 1:47 am #254262Agreed paper was harder than expected..mcq are downright unfair and I’m surprised the examiner doesn’t relax them a bit following december 14 feedback alone..was looking forward to wacc calcs and cashflow and disappointed we got stuck with the harder more challenging questions in this paper..very unfair 🙁
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.