Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › *** December 2024 ACCA SBR exam – Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 35 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago by Eugenia18.
- AuthorPosts
- December 5, 2024 at 9:00 am #713840December 5, 2024 at 4:50 pm #713941
Does anyone remember what was the morning session question 2? The first part was Mr Admir and ethics, but what was the second part of question 2??
These are the questions that I recall. Which ones am I missing?
1) Consol – Impairment of Goodwill, Disposal of Sub to Associate, Research & Dev costs treatment & Deferred tax
2) Mr Admir Ethics and Professionalism.
3) Wind farms expected useful life, Wind farms additional disassembly and lower scrap value, Inventory to NRV,
4) Scooters, Trains, Taxis – Segment reporting
5) APM Adjusted Earnings, Operating Profit
6) Provision & contingent liability
7) Sale & Leaseback
8) SustainabilityDecember 5, 2024 at 5:12 pm #713943AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
Operating segments
December 5, 2024 at 5:52 pm #713947Mine was okay. Wanted to ask the treatment of pay or get contract in Q3, was that onerous contract ?
December 5, 2024 at 6:44 pm #713960How was the APM – adjusted earnings question answered?
December 5, 2024 at 6:45 pm #713962I had stated it was onerous.
December 5, 2024 at 6:46 pm #713963Operating segments
Scooters. Taxi and train services through mobile app.December 5, 2024 at 7:33 pm #713976This was my exam:
Q.1 acquisition of subsidiary.
How to treat an equity instruments – (JV) in the individual and consolidated books.
Q2. Ethical implications of govt grants.
Treatment of govt grant.
Q3. Leases consideration – finance or operating lease and contract testing as part of definition of lease
Treatment of dta
Q4. IFRS15 , Key judgement disclosures – IFRS15 and investor analysis
And a basic question on subsidiaryFound it okay really. Anyone else got this?
December 5, 2024 at 8:19 pm #713979Yes had the same question, found the pension question a bit left field, what did you put for the patent being revalued to the futures cash flows of the licenses? I said that it had no market so couldn’t be revalued but now starting to think differently
December 5, 2024 at 8:54 pm #713981Had the same exam as you and answered that similarly. Said that because it was a patent that was legal protection of a very specific thing that couldn’t be sold in an active market
Pension question i wrote about how the things that happened affected the balance on the SOFP and how the pension asset will be subject to deferred tax and the acid ceiling testDecember 5, 2024 at 9:39 pm #713982You’re right. Same.
I was winging the pension Q and revenue key judgements
December 5, 2024 at 11:24 pm #713983Was it finance or operating lease guys?
December 5, 2024 at 11:41 pm #713984I had Operating Lease because of the fact that the lessor could have substituted the asset and compensate the lessee for losses. But it seems like the correct answer was finance lease.
December 5, 2024 at 11:41 pm #713985I had Operating Lease because of the fact that the lessor could have substituted the asset and compensate the lessee for losses. But it seems like the correct answer was finance lease.
December 6, 2024 at 12:01 am #713986I had this! I didn’t realise in Q1 you had to calculate goodwill a year later for the surveying!
December 6, 2024 at 7:06 am #713989what pension question actually asked for ?
December 6, 2024 at 8:24 am #713990I put finance lease as it was for its whole
useful life and although they could replace it. They had to pay the company while they replaced, indicating the lessor has no control of the assetDecember 6, 2024 at 8:26 am #713991I don’t think you had to calculate goodwill a year later, just had to state that if you received the valuation after the 12 months then you couldn’t use it. Then the original carrying amount should have been used not the fair value adjustment
December 6, 2024 at 9:17 am #713993I put finance lease too
December 6, 2024 at 11:18 am #713999I wrote finance lease, cause lease was for 30 years from 40, most of useful life, and lessee had option to purchase the building. And in past experience it did it every time.
December 6, 2024 at 11:22 am #714000Same
December 6, 2024 at 11:49 am #714001What you did with research and dev cost on artificial cells? and in Q1 their was deff tax liability but the tax relief year and expense incurring year was the same so I thought that their would be no need to put deff tax liab but instead it was a relief , however no temporary difference. What you did with that ?
December 6, 2024 at 3:39 pm #714024Please remind me who had to pay for the substitution the lessor or lessee
And on the surveyors report on the scenario it was within the 12months right?
December 6, 2024 at 6:15 pm #714038I said that the research and dev costs could not be capitalised since there is no expectation of future economic benefits since the safety trials are in the early stages.
Deferred tax had to be reversed since tax base and accounting treatment was the same (i.e. both allowed in the year of payment).
December 6, 2024 at 7:16 pm #714042Went with finance lease as well for reasons stated above. Also even though they could substitute it wouldn’t make business sense due to compensation of losses.
Therefore they should recognise a finance lease receivable.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.