I’m confused about the consistency between conceptual framework and IAS 12 recognition criteria. The kit says that, ‘Conceptual F/W states when probability of inflow/out flow is low disclose in notes however IAS 12 requires Deferred Tax to be recognized even if possibility is low’
While reading the study text I didn’t come across this inconsistency, as the revised conceptual framework doesn’t talk about the probability but the potential to produce economic benefits.
You make a fair point. IAS 12 requires us to recognise DT on a revaluation even if we have no intention of ever selling the asset. I cannot see how that is relevant to users.
As always, IAS 12 takes precedence over Framework.
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy