Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Chapter 5 Practice Question Klopp Co
- This topic has 6 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by akuleva.
- AuthorPosts
- August 8, 2021 at 6:28 pm #630847
Referring to the last lecture video on Chapter 5 on OpenTuition, the practice question, Klopp Co:
Since the cost of land and buildings were given as at 20X2, shouldn’t we depreciate it by 5 years if we want to revalue it in 20X7? Or do we not depreciate it since it says “economic life remains unchanged”?
August 19, 2021 at 9:37 pm #632254Hi,
I think you are correct, I’ll re-check the question and answer to make sure it is right going forward.
Thanks
August 26, 2021 at 1:22 am #632943Hi is there an update on this? and can i know why the gain on depreciation expense of $ 20000 was added to retained earnings ?
thank you so much!October 21, 2021 at 6:23 am #638670Same here. According to the exam preparation solution on the notes, the revaluation was based on the carrying value, that being (land 500,000 + building 5,000,000-(5,000,000/50*5 dep^)= 5,000,000 substracted from the revalued amount 6,000,000 = 1,000,000 revaluation reserve.
Thus, there´s a difference of 500,000 between the two answers, the one on the video on the one on the notes.
Many thanks for shedding some light in this respect.November 28, 2021 at 10:49 pm #641964Please, can anyone help me! I don’t get where did the share premium 600,000 * 0.8 = 480,000 come from? I don’t see any 0.8 figure anywhere. Correct me If I am wrong. Thank you!
July 24, 2022 at 7:20 pm #661752@ boranaresulaj: I think your question referes to note (i)
On 1 Jan X8, Klopp Co issued 600,000 shares at their full market price of $1.80Buth since these are $1 shares, in the share capital was put at $600,000. This is the nominal value of the shares. I think the 0.8 comes from $1.80 – the nominal $1 = $0.80 PREMIUM which is entered into the share premium column. Please correct me if I’m wrong!
Note: you’ve probably passed the exam, but someone else may have the same query, so I believe I’m helping someone! Apologies if I’m wrong but you gotta admit it’s a cracking theory!
August 5, 2022 at 4:27 pm #662515Hello,
is there any update? shouldn’t revaluation be 1M not 500 thousand after all?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.