[zuiis]

you have to write both objectives and research questions

[zuiis]

go for P5

[zuiis]

thanx i appreciate ur work regarding this plz can u elaborate your point 4 because i also noticed his information relevance tone but cant grip his approach

[zuiis]

i have some notes which may help u tell me ur email id

[zuiis]

@angryhamtaro can u plz send it at zuiis007@yahoo.com

[zuiis]

count me in

[zuiis]

u can take p2 and f7 together it a good combination i myself did f7 and p2 in dec attempt and i passed both

[zuiis]

dear at the end its ur choice which book to follow but my advise is to go with emilewoolf it is much better than kaplan as i read both books

[zuiis]

MANAGEMENT COMMENTARY
LEASE
Fair Value Measurement
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT: IMPAIRMENT AND AMORTIZATION
Revenues
AN IMPROVED CONCEPTUAL REPORTING FRAMEWORK

Above are the current issues which are likely to come in dec 2011,i have useful notes on these issues if u want them tell me ur email id

[zuiis]

oka financial instruments done

[zuiis]

If its ok with u can we start standards kit from 26 oct bcz im giving final touching to consolidation.Thanx

[zuiis]

Further adding to frost try question Ejoy, this question had adjustment for Pre Acq dividend

[zuiis]

@pumma90 said:
Hi, I am going to sit the P1 paper in December.
For those who have done or are in the same position as me; how did you approach revision? What was the most effective way to revise for you? What tips do you have on best approaching the P1 paper as I am struggling on an effective method to approach my studying with P1. How many hours of revision per day would you recommend?
Thanks, hope you can help 🙂

dont try to memorize whole book only u have to understand the concept behind the topic and then do past paper

[zuiis]

it depends on u that whether u r comfortable woth Bpp or Kaplan becoz both r official publisher but as far as my concern i will suggest u to go with Kaplan

[zuiis]

consider me in

[zuiis]

pass with 57.Thanx to Allah

[zuiis]

sorry fellows i cannot post those quetions rite now bcz im not in my home country i will post those questions in 15 to 20 days.I hope u understand

[zuiis]

go for kaplan book and kit

[zuiis]

@decentguy185 said:
I got cost of debt.. around 7%.. WACC >11.. Npv i remember was +2226 i think..
a{i} 2100 a{ii} 3900 (not sure 3100 3500).. Not sure about dividend yield calculation.. dps/mv of share… cum div share price or ex div share?.. not sure i used ex..thats all i remember.. if i at least get the calculations rite then i mite get 50..

i also got the same results

[zuiis]

@amarain said:
Hi Sabrina,

Im not quite sure (sorry) but I read the same and after lokking at the question my impression is that an underwriter is someone taking the responsibility to buy shares if these are not sold. In that Question I believe that the company would buy the shares that are not bought by the public.

Anyone has another explanation please?

Amarain

According to me ur rite

[zuiis]

plz can anybody explain why dont we include cost values(license fee) in part b questions and why we discount rate 11%

[zuiis]

In planning variance u should compare Revised budget/standard with Original budget/standards

In operational variances u should compare revised budget/standard with actual results
i hope u got it and i also want a favour from u could u plz explain me how to deal with mix and yield variances if there is any loss in question

[zuiis]

dear send me ur email adress i will send u the text book in pdf format

[zuiis]

@azfaradnan said:
thanx mohib!!!
another Q about the same paper is, which was asked by sm1 but nt yet answered n i wanna knw it as well, cz m finding difficulty myself…….

I will be giving my F4 paper (UK Stream) this June. All i want to know is How important are case laws really ??

I want to know whether if i attempt the Questions with cases in the Following Manner, will i be able to receive Equal marks ??

1. Case Law with All the Details
2. Case Law with Just the Name, No year, And a point to point fActs regarding the case.
3. No Case from the Book specifically, I make up my own case; ABC Vs XYZ, but a case that is similar to the Question requirements and has the nessessary information.

I don’t think the examiners would have an Issue with the 3rd Option, because after all, they are here to give us a basic insight into Law… right ???

Please Let me Know…
thanx!!!

for me point 2 iz better option(just write case name and few lines for fact) i cleared my f4 paper in dec 09 attempt and i was in same situation as u mentioned in above three points and u dont believe i only written abt 7 to 9 cases in exam with 2 to 3 lines of explation and yet passed with good marks.i hope this will help u
Remember me in ur prayers

[Author]

Posts