Forum Replies Created
- Posts
ak2401 wrote:Question 1 I had roles one. He seemed to have jumbled the roles of CEO & Chair. He had bits in wrong section. So had to put them back in right places. Was like a puzzle.
I didn’t have time to add anything that he possibly omitted. I spent all my time writing about the nonsense he wrote lol.
And I actually wrote similar headings for the stages of change for question 2. I don’t think we’re wrong
accastudentxx wrote:I could not finish the paper, left about 15 marks, and also had to really rush in the last few questions that i managed to finish.
I stick to my alloted time per question. At this level we should not be running out of time in the exam
mohsintariq wrote:I could not understand task 1 hence no marks there for me. What was this about?
It depends on which question you got. There were two exams. One was about strategy committee. and another exam asked us to evaluate the Ceo’s opinion of the roles between Chairman and CEO.
I got the latter. which i find it was very easy, all I had to do was assess all his opinions and comment if its wrong or not and give recommendations
It depends on which question you got. There were two exams. One was about strategy committee. and another exam asked us to evaluate the Ceo’s opinion of the roles between Chairman and CEO. That’s question 1
The proposal to acquire and emarketing questions also had some differences.
I believe the only questions that were the same for all variants were question 2 (employee issues) and question 4 (risk question)
@tinusunit said:
Thought Lean Management was about TQM, Kaizen costing and Just in time… All 3 used at once control and improve performance.Didn’t do enough calculations and wasted too much time on number one.
Answered 2 and 4.
I always compare Benchmarking with Performance prism in my head, almost similar but BM doesn’t not take into account stakeholder satisfaction and contribution. So mentioned that as a negative.
I don’t think mentioning performance prism was a good idea as it was taken out of the syllabus for this sitting
<cite> @anny786 said:</cite>
It was res ipa loquiterI completely left that
Civil courts structure my mind went blank I wrote about county courts, hight Court magistrates and supreme Court.
Q5 dividends what a mess
Question about directors couldn’t write muchScenario questions were probably the only good thing
Overall it was very hard #
you are wrong about your “novus actus interveniens” answer. The correct answer is
Extra Damage caused by the
1. Claimant
2. Third Party
3. Natural event<cite>@yaserrasa said:</cite>
Hey there,
a. The secretary can be removed from the board.
b. The secretary can be dismissed from his office without any notice.
c. The articles cannot be changed in order to force the director to sell his shares. Because in this regard, the individual has not the capacity of an employee. He is having the capacity of a shareholder (a member of the company) and thus they cannot change the articles. Changing the articles is not in the benefit of the company and shareholders as a whole.you are wrong, refer to case law sidebottom v kershaw. Once a director is competing or being dishonest in the form of the case scenario, the other members could compel him to sell his shares because its for the best interest of the comany. However the situation in the Dafen Tinplate case is unlawful
