Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- January 18, 2025 at 9:29 am #714756
I take your point. :).
The learning point is that the PPE is not derecognised. But I need to change the wording in the question slightly. I’ll do it when the lecture is next re-recorded.
Thank you for feeding this back.
January 18, 2025 at 9:11 am #714755Unrealsed profits are more likely to be tested in FR, but only for a mark or so. It’s not a major SBR issue.
I recommend you watch the FR lectures on groups again.
Golden rule = adjust in books of ‘seller’.
January 13, 2025 at 8:36 am #714550Strictly speaking, there will be a FX reserve, which would be used.
On the next update, I think I will change the requirement from ‘retained earnings’ to ‘reserves’
Thanks for pointing this out.
🙂
January 13, 2025 at 8:31 am #714549🙂
January 12, 2025 at 9:23 am #714536BPP – use our discount code, as advertised on this page.
January 12, 2025 at 9:22 am #714535🙂
January 12, 2025 at 9:22 am #714534Your argument is very well put – you almost convinced me about the asset!
But, as you say, in reality, the money is given to a financial institution (e.g. Aviva) – it is an additional expense of employing the staff.
Interestingly, even DB plans were not on the balance sheet 30 years ago.
🙂
January 9, 2025 at 8:25 am #714489(Don’t forget that, in the exam, explanations are more important than numbers).
How to approach:
1. Cash settled element – Dr P&L Cr Liability
– normal calculation, based on FV of instrument at SFP date.2. Equity settled element – Dr P&L Cr Equity
– based on formula – A minus B
– A = Number of instruments if equity settled x FV of SHARE BASED ROUTE at grant date
– B = Number of instruments if cash settled x FV of instrrument at grant dateIf you are interested, detail in Chapter 8 of:
https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmgsites/xx/pdf/ifrg/2024/isg-handbook-share-based-payments.pdf
January 9, 2025 at 8:17 am #714488No. Imagine that I make sausages.
My salary cost should reflect cost of making sausages not cost of buying other companies.
(Answer given for exam purposes only).
January 6, 2025 at 8:10 am #714444I think, as you say:
Dr Liability
Cr Salary expense(All answers given for exam purposes only 🙂 )
January 6, 2025 at 8:09 am #714443If the company sells 100 goods and (based on estimates) there’s a 30% chance of returns:
Dr Cash 100
Cr Revenue 70
Cr Contract liability 30The goods likely to be returned remain in inventory
January 5, 2025 at 2:42 pm #7144321. Assuming they can take some revenue (as they have) in x8, and that’s only appropriate if there’s been a transfer of control. 🙂
2. Then, the change in contractual terms is a non-adjusting event. (I agree with that).
3. So the extra revenue will be takem in the x9 year, not the x8.
Hope trhis helps
🙂
January 3, 2025 at 8:30 am #714389Consideration type = cash
Variable = no
Record = on despatch (less expected returns)
Mismatch = don’t understand your questionJanuary 2, 2025 at 10:12 am #714374No revenue at all can be recognised unless there is a change in control (or some other criterial in IFRS 15 are satisfied).
What justification do they give for recognising any revenue? Let me know.
December 20, 2024 at 8:45 am #714260🙂
December 19, 2024 at 8:11 am #714245ACCA website = examinable documents
iasplus website has very useful summary of each standard
🙂
December 17, 2024 at 7:31 am #714228Equity based:
– reward usually share options
– calc uses FV of instrument at grant date
– Cr EquityCash based:
– reward is cash
– calc uses FV of instrument at SFP date
– Cr LiabilityDecember 13, 2024 at 9:03 am #714170Assume it’s PPE.
Dr PPE Cr Revenue
Don’t forget – ONLY USE JOURNALS IN THE ANSWER WHEN ASKED – JOURNALS ARE NOT EXPLANATIONS
🙂 🙂
December 11, 2024 at 1:49 pm #714146If your double entry is OK, sprend some time on FR.
If your double entry is not OK – briefly review FA, then work on FR.
The key aspect of FR is the accounting standards – re-learning the rules.
🙂
December 11, 2024 at 1:46 pm #714145Fair point. You would need the historic rate if you had to prove exchange differences in OCI.
However (trust me!) I would probably show the translation at both rates. 🙂
December 5, 2024 at 3:58 pm #713931Please refer to Kim’s answer in AAA forum, and please don’t post in 2 forums. 🙂
December 3, 2024 at 5:46 pm #713774Please provide enough detail from the question.
December 3, 2024 at 5:44 pm #713773I don’t have all the detail of these questions.
Best I can do is give you an example.
If inventory increases from 12 to 20, and the subsidiary acquired has inventory of 5, then the INCREASE IN INVENTORY will be 3 (and not 8).
If you agree with that, move on!! If not, come back to me.
🙂
December 3, 2024 at 5:40 pm #713772Check the requirement:
– CALCULATE = calculate only
– EXPLAIN OR DISCUSS = write 3 sentences explaining what you have done – you don’t need to write as miuch as aboveIf you are asked to EXPLAIN / DISCUSS and all you do is calculate, you would not achieve a pass.
December 3, 2024 at 5:36 pm #713771If it’s your weakest area, then appraching at the end of the exam may be sensible, BUT YOU MUST STICK TO YOUR TIME ALLOCATION..
Make sure you have worked through my examples:
https://opentuition.com/acca/sbr/
(Buckfastleigh, Staverton, Totnes)
It may help to revisit some of the basic adjustments i in our FR notes
- AuthorPosts