• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

pakistan098

Profile picture of pakistan098
Active 8 years ago
  • Topics: 10
  • Replies: 16
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 1, 2014 at 1:55 pm #215115
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks Mike.

    what does you mean by marketable commodities. Co. all inventory are marketable…

    What are the exception in IAS 2 specifically for using Replacement cost to value Inventory….

    November 30, 2014 at 7:12 pm #214849
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    thanks Mike
    is it compulsory that we should recognized fair value gain.

    August 8, 2014 at 12:33 am #187819
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    got 63.. Thanks to Almighty ALLAH

    August 8, 2014 at 12:32 am #187816
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Got 70 felling…………….

    June 6, 2014 at 6:19 pm #174776
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    @rahee but we must take the project and only use the remaining 5000 on the other project.

    June 6, 2014 at 6:06 pm #174765
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Q in which wacc was required the cost of debt was 4.4% the ke was 10.3 and the mv of equity was 75 and mv of debt was 15 which gives WACC 9.32 %. and if we assume that the Mv of the debt of target co is after tax it would gives us project specific cost of equity = 12. some thing …

    June 6, 2014 at 5:54 pm #174760
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    @pringo Time was enough if you know how and what to do. yeh practice was important…..

    June 6, 2014 at 5:25 pm #174738
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    I think project E, d c and 20% of the A was the mix

    June 6, 2014 at 5:19 pm #174734
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Got NPV AROUND negative (23000) .total no . of new shares are 2500 (9400/4.7*.80) which gives total no of shares to 14500. total market value of equity 65800 (56400+9400). and terp $4.54 is it right

    June 4, 2014 at 6:22 pm #173891
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Q 4 was tricky but q1, q2 was too easy Forgot EPS and q5 was ok but out of time only 80% of Q3 completed

    June 3, 2014 at 9:41 am #173163
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks Mike..

    June 3, 2014 at 8:52 am #173146
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks Mike… while calculating the Valuation of Associate could we deduct the dividend received from associate from investment +share of post-acq profit..

    June 1, 2014 at 7:32 pm #172463
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanka Mike …..

    June 1, 2014 at 5:51 pm #172416
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks for reply but when pv of lease payment is less than the cash price what will do?

    May 25, 2014 at 2:58 pm #170706
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks Mike. that make sense..

    May 25, 2014 at 11:14 am #170637
    mysterypakistan098
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    extracts…..
    In recent years Hillusion has acquired a reputation for buying modestly performing
    businesses and selling them at a substantial profit within a period of two to three years
    of their acquisition. On 1 July 2011 Hillusion acquired 80% of the ordinary share capital
    of Skeptik at a cost of $10,280,000. On the same date it also acquired 50% of Skeptik
    10% loan notes at par. The summarised draft financial statements of both companies
    are:
    Income statements: Year to 31 March 2012
    Hillusion Skeptik
    $000 $000

    Loan interest received (paid) 75 (200)

    Profit before tax 12,075 3,600
    Taxation (3,000) (600)
    Profit for the year 9,075 3,000

    Retained earnings brought forward 16,525 5,400

    Retained earnings per balance sheet 25,600 8,400

    Statements of financial position: as at 31 March 2012
    Hillusion Skeptik
    $000 $000

    Equity and liabilities
    Ordinary shares of $1 each 10,000 2,000
    Retained earnings 25,600 8,400

    The following information is relevant:
    (i) The fair values of Skeptik assets were equal to their carrying values (book values)
    with the exception of its plant, which had a fair value of $3.2 million in excess of
    its carrying value at the date of acquisition. The remaining life of all of Skeptik’s
    plant at the date of its acquisition was four years and this period has not changed
    as a result of the acquisition. Depreciation of plant is on a straight-line basis and
    charged to cost of sales. Skeptik has not adjusted the value of its plant as a result
    of the fair value exercise.
    (ii) In the post acquisition period Hillusion sold goods to Skeptik at a price of $12
    million. These goods had cost Hillusion $9 million. During the year Skeptik had
    sold $10 million (at cost to Skeptik) of these goods for $15 million.

    (iii) Hillusion bears almost all of the administration costs incurred on behalf of the
    group (invoicing, credit control, etc). It does not charge Skeptik for this service as
    to do so would not have a material effect on the group profit.
    (iv) Revenues and profits should be deemed to accrue evenly throughout the year.
    (v) The current accounts of the two companies were reconciled at the year-end with
    Skeptik owing Hillusion $750,000.
    (vi) It is the accounting policy of Hillusion that the non-controlling interests in its
    subsidiary should be valued at a proportionate share of net assets.
    .
    Required:
    (a) Prepare a consolidated income statement and consolidated statement of financial
    position for Hillusion for the year to 31 March 2012. (20 marks)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Erinmay27 on The effects of interest rates and exchange rates on business performance
  • Erinmay27 on The effects of interest rates and exchange rates on business performance
  • amarz on Formation and Authority, Termination and Liability – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • Ermali on PPE – revaluation downwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • siu18 on Joint arrangements – Introduction – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in