Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 5, 2019 at 5:41 pm #555186
Do you remember your working for investment in associate?
Did you use the FV consideration for the original acquisiton and how did you calculate the associates post acq reserves?December 5, 2019 at 4:14 pm #555163@thatgirl said:
In part A ii) yes you are right this part was confusing but if you looked at the date in this question they asked position on 31.03.20×6 whereas in the scenario text they mentioned that additional 18% was bought on 01.04.20×6! Therefore this question was to account using equity accounting.I was also confused so I had to reread and look at the dates more attentively
I see so we were only meant to equity account for the 30%?
December 5, 2019 at 3:53 pm #555149@bg12321 said:
Yep so part a) equity method, i.e. the CSI method in the SOFP (SPLOCI wasn’t examined).Part b) consolidation using step acquisition technique
Wasn’t part a) primarily discussion around significant influence vs control?
It was only a couple of hours ago and my mind has already gone to mush haha
Yeah
part A (i) asked why was it accounted for as an associate and not a sub/control or somethingand
(ii) was to equity account for the extra 18% (30% to 48%) it since it was correctly accounted for as an associate. My mind went blank on this one. Did we have to calculate investment in associate and if yes what was the working?
Part B (i)(ii)
If i remeber correclty was assume control has taken place calculate the goodwill, net assets and explain why they have control (share options, key management personnel, majority shareholding etc)December 5, 2019 at 3:34 pm #555143I dont think that was the case. Im pretty sure Q1 Part (a) was strictly equity method. The question in a(i)(ii) said it was ‘correctly’ accounted for as an associate and we were asked to use the equity method. It was only in Part (b) were we asked to treat it as if control had taken place.
December 5, 2019 at 3:20 pm #555137Q1
A (ii) How do we calculate ‘investment in associate’ after acquiring a further 30% equity share?March 21, 2018 at 5:36 am #443185That makes things a lot easier. Thank you
March 21, 2018 at 5:18 am #443176I believe I uploaded the incorrect file with regards to the reference list. A very silly mistake on my behalf. Could you please advise me on which files I would have to resubmit and whether three meetings with a mentor is necessary. Thanks!
March 21, 2018 at 2:41 am #443168Hi LL, thank you for your reply. The thing is it was in alphabetical order since I used endnote! Could I challenge or dispute this in anyway if it turns out that it was in alphabetical order?
June 11, 2017 at 11:38 am #392707There was also a mcq for when business valuation is useful? There were 2 options (i) To value a takeover bid (ii) to value a division. I chose only valuing for a takeover bid. Can someone confirm the correct answer?
June 10, 2017 at 1:27 pm #392496Q32. Cost of machine was paid for on the first year of production. Did we have to include it in YR1 calculations?
June 9, 2017 at 7:19 pm #392322I had a wacc of around 7.3%
Cost of equity= 49×1.05/7.26 -49 or something
MV of equity = 15/0.5 x 7.26Cost of debt= 6.8% using interpolation and irr
MV of loan notes=10000000/100 x94Cost of bank loan= tax relief so 6.8% as well
Book value= 5mFeel free to correct me as to where I wwant wrong
September 11, 2016 at 2:13 pm #339808I had the same answer. 3060 shortage of shakes.
September 7, 2016 at 8:36 pm #338808Aha that makes sense. Thanks
What was the answer for break even. I guessed D 16875September 7, 2016 at 7:02 pm #338755What was the answer to the mcq on roi. Did we have to deduct 40k from assets and add 250k for the new machine and add 10k to profit?
September 7, 2016 at 6:27 pm #338725Q32 was confusing. I ranked by contribution per limited resource(betta?) 1. Cookies 2.Cakes then finally 3.Shakes which left 12,000-10,060=1940 grams after maximum demand(each shake used 1gram) So I calculated shortage as 5000-1940= 3060 and total profit as total contribution from sales-fixed costs.
April 18, 2016 at 8:17 am #31097057 first attempt. Thought I had failed, lost 15 marks in the exam
December 9, 2015 at 3:05 pm #289650Yep really disappointed. I got 23 for cost to manufacture component x Calculated labour as 8 per hour. L took 3 hours at a labour cost of 24 if I remember correctly.
- AuthorPosts