• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

September 2025 ACCA Exam results

Post comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

omz86

Profile picture of omz86
Active 5 years ago
  • Topics: 2
  • Replies: 20
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 5, 2019 at 5:41 pm #555186
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Do you remember your working for investment in associate?
    Did you use the FV consideration for the original acquisiton and how did you calculate the associates post acq reserves?

    December 5, 2019 at 4:14 pm #555163
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    @thatgirl said:
    In part A ii) yes you are right this part was confusing but if you looked at the date in this question they asked position on 31.03.20×6 whereas in the scenario text they mentioned that additional 18% was bought on 01.04.20×6! Therefore this question was to account using equity accounting.

    I was also confused so I had to reread and look at the dates more attentively

    I see so we were only meant to equity account for the 30%?

    December 5, 2019 at 3:53 pm #555149
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    @bg12321 said:
    Yep so part a) equity method, i.e. the CSI method in the SOFP (SPLOCI wasn’t examined).

    Part b) consolidation using step acquisition technique

    Wasn’t part a) primarily discussion around significant influence vs control?

    It was only a couple of hours ago and my mind has already gone to mush haha

    Yeah
    part A (i) asked why was it accounted for as an associate and not a sub/control or something

    and

    (ii) was to equity account for the extra 18% (30% to 48%) it since it was correctly accounted for as an associate. My mind went blank on this one. Did we have to calculate investment in associate and if yes what was the working?

    Part B (i)(ii)
    If i remeber correclty was assume control has taken place calculate the goodwill, net assets and explain why they have control (share options, key management personnel, majority shareholding etc)

    December 5, 2019 at 3:34 pm #555143
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    I dont think that was the case. Im pretty sure Q1 Part (a) was strictly equity method. The question in a(i)(ii) said it was ‘correctly’ accounted for as an associate and we were asked to use the equity method. It was only in Part (b) were we asked to treat it as if control had taken place.

    December 5, 2019 at 3:20 pm #555137
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Q1
    A (ii) How do we calculate ‘investment in associate’ after acquiring a further 30% equity share?

    March 21, 2018 at 5:36 am #443185
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    That makes things a lot easier. Thank you

    March 21, 2018 at 5:18 am #443176
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    I believe I uploaded the incorrect file with regards to the reference list. A very silly mistake on my behalf. Could you please advise me on which files I would have to resubmit and whether three meetings with a mentor is necessary. Thanks!

    March 21, 2018 at 2:41 am #443168
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Hi LL, thank you for your reply. The thing is it was in alphabetical order since I used endnote! Could I challenge or dispute this in anyway if it turns out that it was in alphabetical order?

    June 11, 2017 at 11:38 am #392707
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    There was also a mcq for when business valuation is useful? There were 2 options (i) To value a takeover bid (ii) to value a division. I chose only valuing for a takeover bid. Can someone confirm the correct answer?

    June 10, 2017 at 1:27 pm #392496
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Q32. Cost of machine was paid for on the first year of production. Did we have to include it in YR1 calculations?

    June 9, 2017 at 7:19 pm #392322
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    I had a wacc of around 7.3%
    Cost of equity= 49×1.05/7.26 -49 or something
    MV of equity = 15/0.5 x 7.26

    Cost of debt= 6.8% using interpolation and irr
    MV of loan notes=10000000/100 x94

    Cost of bank loan= tax relief so 6.8% as well
    Book value= 5m

    Feel free to correct me as to where I wwant wrong

    September 11, 2016 at 2:13 pm #339808
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    I had the same answer. 3060 shortage of shakes.

    September 7, 2016 at 8:36 pm #338808
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Aha that makes sense. Thanks
    What was the answer for break even. I guessed D 16875

    September 7, 2016 at 7:02 pm #338755
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    What was the answer to the mcq on roi. Did we have to deduct 40k from assets and add 250k for the new machine and add 10k to profit?

    September 7, 2016 at 6:27 pm #338725
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Q32 was confusing. I ranked by contribution per limited resource(betta?) 1. Cookies 2.Cakes then finally 3.Shakes which left 12,000-10,060=1940 grams after maximum demand(each shake used 1gram) So I calculated shortage as 5000-1940= 3060 and total profit as total contribution from sales-fixed costs.

    April 18, 2016 at 8:17 am #310970
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    57 first attempt. Thought I had failed, lost 15 marks in the exam

    December 9, 2015 at 3:05 pm #289650
    mysteryomz86
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Yep really disappointed. I got 23 for cost to manufacture component x Calculated labour as 8 per hour. L took 3 hours at a labour cost of 24 if I remember correctly.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • marachyz on Group SPL – Example (MYA) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • hellokitty7 on FA Chapter 4 Questions Accruals and Prepayments
  • barbaraseweryn on Presentation of Financial Statements (IFRS18) – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Basic group structures – Impairment – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on MA Chapter 5 Questions Ordering and Accounting for Inventory

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in