Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- March 3, 2018 at 6:20 am #439780
Oh sorry, I wrongly assumed it was a receipt
March 1, 2018 at 4:07 pm #439587Thank you sir
March 1, 2018 at 4:05 pm #439586Oh phew, thank you
March 1, 2018 at 3:16 pm #439563Thank you sir, I understand now
March 1, 2018 at 10:51 am #439509Is it because when assuming that only equity is used, the asset beta is equal to the equity beta?
March 1, 2018 at 10:38 am #439508Oh yes I missed that, thank you
Also why does the all equity financed discount rate use asset beta instead of equity beta?
March 1, 2018 at 10:15 am #439507Thank you sir
February 28, 2018 at 4:21 pm #439408Oops, I’ll take note of that next time
Thank you sir, I understand it now
February 11, 2018 at 11:16 am #436386Thank you for your prompt reply. So the $5000 was from a bank loan that was swapped at the current rate in year 0. At year 3, the government buys back the project for $7500, but $5000 of this $7500, is considered hedged as Buryecs will have to pay $5000 (at the original rate) back to the bank to repay the loan?
September 3, 2017 at 3:56 pm #405201thank you sir, its much clearer now
September 3, 2017 at 2:18 pm #405179Sorry sir, i was in a rush while typing the question and forgot to add in the details. Mar/June 2017 Question 1.
In the calculation of the value foregone by the VCOs, why is the value of their unsecured bonds 4,800m (which is the book value in the financial statements)? I am puzzled as to why the book value is used to calculate the value of the unsecured bonds without considering the interest payments that the VCOs would lose from cancelling the bondsSeptember 2, 2017 at 10:52 am #405002Just to clarify, you said 1/r, by that do you mean 1/required return?
September 2, 2017 at 10:51 am #405001Thank you for your prompt reply sir I understand better now
September 2, 2017 at 10:08 am #404994Also why is it that the estimated value of the cash flows is not discounted if the cash flow is from the end of year 1? Shouldn’t the value be {[(435×1.08)/0.1]x0.909} ?
August 31, 2017 at 3:00 pm #404666Thank you sir
August 24, 2017 at 4:27 pm #403362And also if royalties are deducted from the first cash flow, why isn’t the contribution from the components deducted as well?
August 24, 2017 at 4:09 pm #403357Thank you sir, I now understand the need for the two cash flow statements and why the royalties were added back into the cash flows in the home country. However I’m still confused as to why the royalties were deducted from the foreign country, since the company would be receiving the royalties and is therefore not an outflow?
August 16, 2017 at 10:03 am #402029Oh I see thank you sir
August 15, 2017 at 1:06 am #401880Thank you sir
August 14, 2017 at 4:47 pm #401823Oh i see now, thanks again sir
August 12, 2017 at 5:20 pm #401613ohhhhhh yes now it makes sense, thank you sir
July 21, 2017 at 3:36 pm #397958Thank you for the prompt reply sir, I understand fully now
June 23, 2017 at 12:38 pm #393889Thank you so much sir, I will listen to the lecture again
- AuthorPosts