Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- March 27, 2019 at 2:07 pm #510595
Chris, thank you so much for your explanation. I will log in to see how it works. π
March 27, 2019 at 12:01 am #510526Hi Chris, thanks for your reply. However, I still have some doubts, hope you can help me with them.
1) So is it true that either my supervisor or manager (both are non-qualified accountants) are able to sign off my time? Are there any specific requirements to sign off my time?
2)In my company, the finance and administration are merged into one department (to save cost I think). Hence the title of my current position is “finance and admin staff”. Despite the name of my position, I mostly do accounting work. However, I am afraid that the name of my position will affect me when I claim for the time. Does it in anyway affect me?
November 27, 2018 at 3:27 am #486064By using standards, u mean based on past experience and company’s policies to produce the budgets?
Is standard costing used to produce fixed budgets and flexible budgets as both budgets are for a period of 1 year?
November 17, 2018 at 2:58 am #485047My question assumes that the company buys the high quality raw materials in order to minimise the number of rejected products.
November 12, 2018 at 3:17 pm #484602Ok, thank you π
November 11, 2018 at 5:26 pm #484490Thanks for your compliment π
So the answer be like this?
Y1: –
Y2: Add back 300
Y3: Add back 500
Y4: Add back 375
Y5: Add back 250
Y6: Add back 125
Y7: –For Y2 and Y3, we add back 300 in Y2 and 500(200+300) in Y3.
For Y4 to Y7, the CE is being amortized so the amount is becoming less by each year.
November 11, 2018 at 8:02 am #484447Ken, i would also like to ask about the Capital Employed.
Using the same example above, the Capital Employed used for the calculation of EVA will be:
Y1:-
Y2: Add back $300
Y3: Add back $200
Y4-6: –I left Y1 ‘blank’ as Opening Capital Employed is used. However, I do feel a bit uncertain to leave Y4 to Y6 ‘blank’. Are there any mistakes in my answer?
November 11, 2018 at 3:07 am #484432Sorry, my bad about that. Thank you very much.
November 4, 2018 at 3:53 pm #483785Okay, thank you π
November 4, 2018 at 6:36 am #483717Is my format as shown below appropriate?
“Appendix” (appendix before everything else)
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:Introduction
“Report content”
October 23, 2018 at 5:39 pm #479590Thank you π
October 14, 2018 at 5:54 pm #478019Understood, thank you π
October 4, 2018 at 6:19 pm #476451Okay, thank you very much π
September 19, 2018 at 1:55 am #475173Ok, thank you very much.
August 26, 2017 at 11:35 am #403650Ok, understood. Thanks John. π
August 26, 2017 at 9:46 am #403628Oops, I missed out that line. Sorry John for asking this stupid question, I will be more careful next time.
August 11, 2017 at 5:45 pm #401531Okay, understood. Thanks John. π
August 11, 2017 at 7:07 am #401435Thank you for ur reply John,
1) I still dont understand, why when the realisable value is after tax we dont need to calculate the balancing allowance/ balancing charge?
2) I understand the first part of my question. Thank you. However, you forget to answer the second part of my question.
3) Thank you, I understand now. π
July 27, 2017 at 7:46 am #398966Ok, understood. Thank You John π
July 27, 2017 at 4:11 am #398955So for BBS stores (June 2009), questions a ii), why are the retained earnings reduced by 817?
July 26, 2017 at 5:20 am #398672Dear John,
1) Is the way we treat redeemable and irredeemable bonds the same (in terms of
calculation, not definition)?2) For convertible bonds, the questions will state something like this:
-20 million loan in the form of 6% convertible bond on which interest is payable annually.
Conversion may be undertaken on the basis of 50 equity shares for every $100 from the
beginning of year five onwards.Can I ignore the second sentence (Coversion….onwards) ? Because for the questions that I have done regarding convertible bonds so far, the answers have nothing to do with the second sentence.
July 25, 2017 at 3:51 am #398516Thanks John, great explanation. π
July 23, 2017 at 4:49 am #398170Thank you very much John, I understand now.
July 21, 2017 at 4:00 pm #397966I understand now, thank you very much John.
July 21, 2017 at 8:06 am #397886Sir, in Pursuit Co (June 2011), we don’t have to minus the TAD before computing the tax as it states that the operating profit is after TAD, is that correct? Can we assume that operating profit is always after TAD? By the way, is operating profit the same as EBIT?
- AuthorPosts