[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks John. What do you mean by “However given that the total cost is fixed” ? Does this mean we only carry out absoprtion costing on fixed overhead costs ?

[arahnsathananthan]

I will miss you too Mike but will look at the forum from time to time 🙂

[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks a lot Mike for your help as always. Only a few more days till the exam !

Kind regards,

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

Thats right ! Could you please tell me why those are the answers ?

[arahnsathananthan]

Thankyou very much Mike. I appreciate your help 🙂

[arahnsathananthan]

My exam is in two weeks but happy to discuss together if you want ?

[arahnsathananthan]

No problem Mike.

[arahnsathananthan]

No problem. Thanks Mike. Sorry for the hassle

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike. What lecture is this in ?

Kind regards,

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks Mike 🙂

[arahnsathananthan]

Love you Mike ! thankyou so much. My exam is in a couple of weeks. I will let you know how I did.

[arahnsathananthan]

what to do you mean 2 similar charges on the same property for example ?

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike. I understand this but I do not understand what you mean in the lecture when you talk about them creating a receivable.

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike

Thanks for your reply. I cannot find the mneumonic you have mentioned in the partnership lecture. Could you let me know what lecture it appears in ?

Thanks

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike

It was around the 5 min mark as mentioned in the trading certificate lecture Chapter 10.

I hope you can tell me what you mean by the Mneumonic.

Kind regards,

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

Perfect thanks Mike !

[arahnsathananthan]

Thankyou very much Mike. What do you mean by 5% interest on Loans and Advances above fixed capital.It is on the 1890 partnership act lecture.

[arahnsathananthan]

Thank you very much Mike. I will let you know my result. I am taking the exam at the end of December many thanks for your reply.

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi It is on the lecture on Tort. The time on the recorded lecture is from 24 minutes and 17 seconds. On this article, it says that Glasgow was liable !

https://www.lawteacher.net/cases/glasgow-corporation-v-taylor.php

Thanks for the reply Mike. Just wanted to let you know 🙂

Many thanks

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks Mike. Understand it a lot better thanks to your explanation.

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike

Thanks for providing the link. I don’t really understand the case. I hope you can explain it

Arahn

[arahnsathananthan]

I understand thanks Mike

[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks Mike. What do you mean about privity ? Is that about a promise ?

[arahnsathananthan]

Hi Mike. I do understand this case but how does it differ to the definition given by Currie v Misa ?

[arahnsathananthan]

Thanks Mike !

[Author]

Posts