• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FR:
  • FR Notes
  • FR Lectures
  • FR Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • FR Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 8 – Example (errors) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. phoben says

    October 27, 2024 at 5:24 am

    In the part SOCE, why is the RE – error as (500) only, what about the error happened in 2009 of 300k ?

    Log in to Reply
    • phoben says

      October 27, 2024 at 5:34 am

      why is 1,200 under SOCE – RE under TCI ?

      Log in to Reply
    • Farhaan says

      November 10, 2024 at 1:12 pm

      For your first question – error is only 500 as we are adjusting the figures from the previous year hence its called brought forward adjustment, the 300k you state of is is an error in the current year which is shown under separate column in SOCE and it is also not part of retained earnings .

      For your second question – 1200 is the retained proft for the year and goes under the retained earnings column and its not under but in the same line as TCI as we want to calculate the total comprehensive income for the years including the revaluation surplus.

      if you still do not understand, I would advise you to get thorough on IAS 16 and SOCE proforma

      Log in to Reply
  2. murerwa says

    April 11, 2024 at 1:57 pm

    hello
    my question is why do they get 1200 as cost of sales and add 500.after they get 2000 as non current assets and minus 500(year 2008)
    what is the logic behind?

    Log in to Reply
    • Eric says

      June 24, 2024 at 1:38 pm

      Impairment of 500 was not considered initially in cost of sale and expenses.

      Log in to Reply
  3. praveenmasih says

    November 25, 2021 at 9:01 pm

    Hiya ,

    If suppose we were having an opening Revaluation reserve bal in 2008 than £500 should have been adjusted from Rev.Res and not from retained earnings/profits?

    Regards.

    Log in to Reply
  4. rmc73 says

    May 9, 2021 at 4:43 pm

    Question – Example #1 : It says some other property had been revalued by $300,000. If we credit revaluation reserve where do we debit it ? In the answer NCA is arrived as
    2008 – 2000
    Less – (500)
    Add – 800 difference between carrying value of 2008 and 2009
    total – 2300

    No impact of revaluation provided. Please can you help to explain this

    Log in to Reply
  5. deviant88 says

    September 26, 2020 at 6:34 am

    To make it little complicated, can there be impact on depreciation charge of this year as there was error in measuring NCA in previous figures? May be not in this question but just possibility?

    Log in to Reply
  6. Patrick says

    June 18, 2020 at 4:42 pm

    why is 500k deducted from the cost of sales and other expenses from 2008, as only depreciated amount related to the non current asset would have been deducted in p&l, then 500k can be deducted from the NCA in SFP.

    Thanks for helping me understand

    Log in to Reply
    • Sanchi2408 says

      June 29, 2020 at 12:50 pm

      500,000 is not deducted but added to cost of sales as it is the impairment. (Depreciation and impairment are always added to cost of sales) and yeah 500,000 is deducted from NCA as it is recorded in excess in 2008 and the same thing continues in 2009 as well. So in balance sheet, 500,000 will be deducted from both year’s given amount. Hope this helps.

      Log in to Reply
  7. jenny91 says

    January 4, 2020 at 8:27 am

    Please HELP!!

    will we need or be asked to illustrate fin. stat. for prior year as we are doing in the examples? i do not see it relevant but do not want to loose marks… i see it relevant to changes in equity for carrying forward balances or if the prior year required a material adjustment –

    Thank you again…

    Log in to Reply
    • jenny91 says

      January 4, 2020 at 8:48 am

      P.S – AMAZING LECTURES- so easy to understand with your teaching!

      Log in to Reply
  8. seun says

    January 24, 2019 at 5:30 pm

    Pls am always confused as to the meaning of ‘restating the comparative figures ‘
    What is comparative figure?
    Thank you.

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      May 20, 2019 at 2:35 pm

      The comparative figures are last year’s published numbers in the financial statements. So if this year is reporting the 2019 results then the comparative figures are for 2018.

      Log in to Reply
  9. qashmar says

    November 7, 2018 at 1:04 pm

    Hi Chris,

    Many thanks for your helpful and clear lectures.

    Just I have one enquiry, isn’t that revaluation of $300 should be charged to P&L of 2009 as last year there was impairment recorded in SPL and to the best of my knowledge any revaluation upward take place after previous impairment would be charged to P&L until reverse the initial impairment booked whether under Cost or Revaluation model.

    Regards,

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      December 31, 2018 at 2:08 pm

      Hi,

      Good knowledge of reversal of impairments, however it specifically states in the question that the revaluation in 2009 relates to other items of property and so not the property that had been impaired.

      Thanks

      Log in to Reply
  10. ctwong says

    August 25, 2018 at 1:57 pm

    Hi Tutor,

    For these errors, is an order the financial positions needs to be done first?

    Thanks

    Cindy

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      December 31, 2018 at 2:05 pm

      Hi Cindy,

      No, the SFP is not necessarily done first as we might need to only adjust the SPL if that is where the error has been made. It all depends on where the initial error has been made as to what needs to be corrected first, so please ensure that you read the questions carefully.

      Thanks

      Log in to Reply
  11. wgk says

    June 17, 2018 at 7:43 am

    Chapter 9, Example 1 – page 36 of notes

    Where does it state that the Reserves in 2008 are ALL related to Retained Earnings? Thanks

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      June 17, 2018 at 7:49 pm

      Hi,

      It doesn’t but we’re not told anything else to the contrary so it is fair enough to assume that they all relate to retained earnings, unless told otherwise.

      Thanks

      Log in to Reply
      • wgk says

        June 18, 2018 at 4:15 am

        thanks

      • wgk says

        June 18, 2018 at 4:33 am

        One further point – is the answer for PFY (2008) correct as per video or as per notes (pp 115). Thanks again.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in