Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 40
- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by irek01.
- AuthorPosts
- March 26, 2019 at 11:55 am #510470
Could you please help me explain this question in BPP workbook:
Burdock has a financial year end of 30 may 2006. It owns a number of prestigious apartments which it leases to famous persons who are under a contract of employment to promote Burdock’s fashion clothing.
The apartments are let below the market rate. The lease terms are short and are normally for 6 months. The leases terminate when the contracts for promoting the clothing terminate. Burdock wishes to account for the apartments as investment properties with the difference between the market rate and actual rental charged to be recognised as an employee benefit expense.The problem i have is that i do understand that since the property is let below the market rate and let to employees, it cannot be recognised under IAS 40. But what about the employee benefits? why can’t we recognise the difference as per IAS 19?
March 27, 2019 at 9:25 pm #510649Hi,
I presume because it does not meet the definition of a short term employee benefit.
Thanks
March 28, 2019 at 2:05 pm #510701Thanks for replying.
The book answer says if it were to be recognized as an employee benefit then it would be necessary to gross up rental income to market rate.
Could you please help me in understanding this a little bit?Many thanks
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.