• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Why doesn’t a contract for an operating lease give rise to a liability?

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › Why doesn’t a contract for an operating lease give rise to a liability?

  • This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by jaggy01.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 17, 2012 at 11:05 pm #52247
    jaggy01
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    As the title suggests, I am having difficult reconciling IAS 17’s treatment of operating leases with the definition of a liability under the framework.

    Suppose a contract is entered for 5 years under which an operating lease will be entered for each year in the period. Then why is it incorrect to say an obligation exists, as a result of past events, resulting in the probable outflow of economic benefits from the entity?

    Thanks so much!

    April 18, 2012 at 6:41 am #96402
    raj123nair
    Participant
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 76
    • ☆☆

    Hi,

    A operating lease wont create a obligation. Ideally operating lease contract is entered on year to year basis. So ideally its quite equal to rental paid the lessor.

    As per you example if contract is entered for 5 year, it could be treated as finance lease if the risk and rewards is transfered to the lessee.

    We have to refer framework only in case if there are not any specific guidance available for treatement of those expense.

    Hope it does help.

    Regards
    Raj

    April 18, 2012 at 5:13 pm #96403
    Vipin
    Member
    • Topics: 151
    • Replies: 374
    • ☆☆☆☆

    rent of operating lease is an expense.
    if not paid by the end of the period it becomes accured expense which is current liability.

    April 21, 2012 at 1:47 pm #96404
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi

    I believe you could be confusing obligations under finance leases with commitments under operating leases.

    Until the recent revision of finance lease criteria, a lease was considered a finance lease if substantially the whole of the risks and rewards were transferred to the lessee. But there was no definition of “substantial”. This was developed by the accounting profession to mean not less than 90%. Applying this to a lease situation, the present value of the minimum lease payments should not be less than 90% of the fair value of the asset. In addition, the lease term should be not less than 90% of the expected useful life of the asset.

    But IASB never intended that such strict rules should be applied. If they had wanted strich rules, they could have written them into the IAS. It was intended that individual situations should be treated individually on their own merits.

    If a lease doesn’t satisfy the definition of a finance lease, then it’s an operating lease. And if it’s an operating lease, the lease costs should be expensed each year.

    In a finance lease, for substantially the whole of the asset’s useful life, there is an obligation to continue to pay for the asset for periods into the future.

    In an operating lease situation, ( in theory ) the lessee is able to rent almost on a monthly basis. So there really isn’t any long term obligation. Even though it may say in a question “The company entered into a 4 year lease ….” In theory, the company could stop the lease and is not obligated to continue to pay for the remainder of the lease term.

    I don’t know if that clears up your concerns at all. It’s all a very subjective area and even the recent revisions which invite the profession to consider the reality rather than the “90%” rule don’t totally resolve the position.

    April 25, 2012 at 2:46 pm #96405
    jaggy01
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Thank you very much, that helps clear some things up.


    @MikeLittle
    I understand the IAS, I’m just not too sure I fully agree with it actually. Especially if operating lease commitments turn out to be binding (surely they may in some jurisdictions?). The Aug 2010 Exposure Draft on leases also makes interesting reading of the issue, and personally I would lean on preferring the proposed right-of-use model. But thanks for clearing it up!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • osman-the-zephyr@ on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • adebusola on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • Sharith on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Sharith on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Replacement – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in