• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

New! Lectures for ACCA AAA September 2022 Exams are now available >>

New! BPP Books for ACCA September 2022 Exams are now available, get your discount code >>

washi (sept 18) and Q3 Hathaway co mock paper 3 BPP kit

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › washi (sept 18) and Q3 Hathaway co mock paper 3 BPP kit

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 months ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 3, 2021 at 12:22 pm #634139
    rialakhani
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Hi,

    In washi co when the investment was to take place 1 year from now, the initial investment was in Y0, but in Hathaway, the project is to take place 1 year from now and they put initial investment in Y1 and discounted it, why?

    September 3, 2021 at 12:41 pm #634144
    rialakhani
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    also for the part a) iii) of the question can you explain why we do 0.7 x 5.6 and not 7.02?

    September 3, 2021 at 4:37 pm #634169
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 49611
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The requirement (c)(ii) specifically says that you are to base the end of the first year as time 0.

    7.02 is ignoring the possibility of a recession and is ignoring the application not being approved.

    For the part of the question asking for the expected value we need to take account of those possibilities.

    September 3, 2021 at 6:16 pm #634195
    rialakhani
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 50
    • ☆☆

    Okay thank you sir. I also have a generic doubt, if the question says cash flows in Y5 increase by 2% but stay at this rate forever, will i discount Y5 cash flow using the Y5 PV factor and then treat it as a perpetuity from Y6 onwards?

    September 4, 2021 at 10:40 am #634248
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 49611
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You can get the same answer in several ways, but the way you state is fine.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • praveenmasih on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • nojwwnolife on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on Discounted Cash Flow Further Aspects, Lease versus Buy – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2022 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy