- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
John Moffat.
John Moffat.-
Posts
-
pinkyjovin123
- Topics: 91
- Replies: 134
- ☆☆☆
Hello sir,
In Dec 2012 q no.2)
How do we get the figure 0.5 as std hours under labour efficiency variance.
And under labour efficiency planning variance how do we get the figures under revised hours for actual production 0.5*1.2??
In Dec 2012 q no.5)
C !!)part
In discussion part how do we get the figure 76% and $8.07In Dec 2008 wargrin Co
In discussion part How do we get the figure
2.4%?
John Moffat
- Topics: 57
- Replies: 51230
- ☆☆☆☆☆
In future please open a new thread for each separate question.
1. The third line of the question says that the standard time for each batch is 0.5 hours.
The question also says that the process became 20% slower, and so instead of taking 0.5 hours it was revised to 0.5 x 1.2 hours (which is the same as 0.5 + (20% x 0.5)
2. The total profit of the retail division is (from the question) 419,246.
Product S is 319,456 of this total, which is 76% of the total.The workings for 8.07 are shown in the answer to part (c)(i)
3. The sales are 840,000. The profit when the design and development costs are taken into account is 20,000. 20,000 is 2.4% of 840,000.
pinkyjovin123
John Moffat- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.