• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Treatment of URP in case of participation in Associate

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Treatment of URP in case of participation in Associate

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 25, 2016 at 7:09 am #335047
    cvincil
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi Mike,
    in the exam June15, Q.9, the Retained Earning calculation deducts the full amount of URP in inventory instead of taking the 80% of it (corresponding to the participation %).
    In a similar example in my BPP book (pag.136) instead it considers the URP multiplied by the % of participation.
    Which one of the 2 approaches is correct?
    Thanks
    Luigina

    August 25, 2016 at 7:52 am #335080
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23310
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There is more than one way to skin a cat (English idiom!)

    You can take the FULL amount from the associate’s retained earnings and then calculate the group’s share of those reduced retained earnings or …

    … you can take the group’s share of the associate’s retained earnings and then deduct the group’s share of the pup

    Say pre-adjustment retained earnings were $100,000, the pup was $5,000 and the percentage holding was 30%

    We can 1) 30% x (100,000 – 5,000) = 28,500 or …

    … 2) (30% x 100,000) – (30% x 5,000) = 28,500

    Does it matter?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • beata443c on Civil Law, Common Law, Criminal Law – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • heary123@ on Group SFP – Unrealised profit and inventory in transit – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on PM Chapter 15 Questions Financial Performance Measurement
  • Ken Garrett on Governance – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in