- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2024 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 21, example 3 page 37 of lecture notes (Holly)
Dear sir,
In the example, the post-acquisition movement from working 2 are being translated using the closing rate. Also, for the Goodwill calculation we are directly translating the goodwill at the closing rate.
However, in the Sept/Dec 2015 Q1 the examiner translated the post-acquisition movement using the average rate and for the Goodwill calculation, the rate at acquisition date was used for translating the FV of the consideration, the NCI at acquisition date, the FV of net assets at acquisition date while impairment was translated at average rate and the goodwill was re-translated at closing rate. This gave a difference in exchange rate.
As such i’m a bit confused between the method you taught us and the method of the examiner.
Hi,
I’d stick to the method that we’ve gone through as it is correct, easier to understand and will still get you all the marks.
Thanks