- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 months ago by
Stephen Widberg.
Stephen Widberg.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
Noah098
- Topics: 936
- Replies: 352
- ☆☆☆☆☆
toobasco co. S/D 18) 4)b) from the list of potential errors-iii)
sir $28m loss was deducted from net cash generated form operating activities, the examiner adds this $28m back as it is non-cash. However we should have added it twice i.e. $56m should have been added back, once to reverse the incorrect treatment by toobasco and second time to reflect the fact that its non-cash.
can you pls explain sir why the examiner only adds back $28m? and not $56m?
Stephen Widberg
- Topics: 10
- Replies: 2529
- ☆☆☆☆☆
The XD in this question are on a foreign subsidiary – so would not have been reflected in P&L. They are an OCI item.
Noah098
Stephen WidbergViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.