• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Technical Article Stakeholders part 2

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBL Exams › Technical Article Stakeholders part 2

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by Ken Garrett.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 20, 2019 at 5:58 am #516357
    justine1
    Member
    • Topics: 13
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Dear Sir,

    Please can you advise what the author is implying in simple terms from the below paragraph (from Stakeholders part 2 technical article):

    “Even in companies where excellent procedures are put in place to assess operational level controls, it is hard to imagine how IA can fully monitor strategic controls. It would be very hard to design a corporate governance structure in which even the most independent IA department had a mechanism to do much more than check that procedures have been followed at board level. The board ultimately has to be responsible for the proper working of strategic level controls. This is also illustrative of the way IA fits in to overall corporate governance. The corporate governance big picture has to be addressed if IA is going to be effective. A domineering CEO cannot be countered by the existence of an IA department. Indeed, interference in the work of internal audit would indicate broader corporate governance problems.”

    Thanks very much

    May 20, 2019 at 8:45 pm #516645
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10589
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I think what it means is that if the board, which we asume consists of well-qualified people, makes strategic decisions, it is going ro be difficult for IA to second-guess those high-level decisions. It is hard to see how IA can fundamentally question or usurp the board’s decisions.

    The last sentence seems to be a non-sequitur.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • amaanalli on Fraud, bribery, whistle-blowing and company ethics – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • verweijlisa on Group SPL – Group profit on disposal – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in