• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Step Disposals – Control is retained

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Step Disposals – Control is retained

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Stephen Widberg.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 4, 2020 at 11:33 pm #560710
    eirinita
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hello, I need your assistance in the following:
    A step disposal where the control is retained, so in substance there is no sale and it is a group shareholders’ transaction.
    Assuming that we have calculated the increase in NCI and we have the following journals:

    Dr Cash (received from the disposal) for example 100
    Cr NCI (is increased by for example) 93
    Cr RE/OCE (?) 7

    When preparing the Consolidated SFP do we account for the 93 in Cash, do we increase it (apart from adding Parent’s + Sub’s balances) by the amount of the transaction?

    I have been working out an example and I got a bit confused.
    I thought that we should account for that, but then the answer had not account for that, and I thought it might be because since it is an intragroup transaction, there is in substance no sale.

    Could you please help me on that?
    Many thanks in advance 🙂

    February 6, 2020 at 7:02 am #560900
    Stephen Widberg
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 16
    • Replies: 3411
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I suspect that, it in the question, they had already recorded the cash, but posted the other side of the double entry to the wrong account.

    I think the 7 would end up in RE not OCE.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • verweijlisa on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Salexy on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • omerbasheer on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in