- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › sept/ dec 2019 Okan co
I am not able to understand why in the module answer they have not considered the tax relief lost for the APV adjustment ?? there is a tax lost by borrowing at 2.1% rather than 5% why the examiner has not considered this in the sample answer?
He has brought it into the answer.
The subsidy benefit is 5 – 2.1 = 2.9% and he has then multiplied this by the loan amount and by 80%. The 80% is to account for the fact that they are not saving tax of 20% on the subsidy.