- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by
.
- Posts
Sir ,
Are these fisher vs bell,adler vs George,Gorris vs Scott etc examinable?Hi Sourav,
For your exam you are not required to memorise the names or facts of the cases. Instead it is the principle of law that arises from case law that you need to remember and be familiar with.
I hope that clarifies the position for you.
Kind regards,
Vijay
Yeah, But do you mean by principle of law. Are you talking about Golden Rule,Literal Rule, Mischief Rule, Purposive Rule
Hi Saurav
There are 2 different questions you appear to raise:
1) Are the cases of Fisher v Bell etc examinable to which the answer is No. You do not need to remember the names of cases. You only need to remember the point of law that arises from the case for example the point of law from Fisher v Bell is that items in a shop window are not offers but instead an example of an invitation to treat.
2) Re statutory rules of interpretation, you need to understand what the literal rule, golden rule etc mean. Id recommend you watch the recorded lectures on this topic and if still uncertain please feel free to ask a more specific question.
Kind regards,
Vijay
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.