• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Robby : consolidation

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Robby : consolidation

  • This topic has 11 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by amna.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 15, 2016 at 9:20 am #349043
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    can you please explain the journal entries in this question about the factoring?

    and about the treatment of the fair value adjustment of Zinc?

    November 16, 2016 at 10:09 pm #349399
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    What is it specifically that you don’t understand about them?

    Thanks

    November 17, 2016 at 11:22 am #349550
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    for the factoring if the seller bears the risk and reward, then receivable is not derecognized right???

    And we have to create a loan to the amount we receive from the factoring and debit the cash with same amount.

    So what do we do to the difference between the receivable and the loan amount, in this case to the 0.4???

    November 17, 2016 at 11:32 am #349551
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    as per the equity interest, why is there an adjustment to RE stating :

    Increase in fair value of equity interest (5·00 – 2·00 – 1·00) = 2·00

    shouldn’t the increase in fair value be calculated,in this case using the FV at the further acquisition(55%) date the $5 and the consideration of $2 at acquisition date of the 5% holding.

    so what is that adjustment of 1 in the calculation???

    November 19, 2016 at 6:10 am #349936
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    can you please clarify this to me please

    November 20, 2016 at 2:18 pm #350151
    armaghanbutt
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 39
    • ☆☆

    sir , i also have same problem for factor rec. 4 – 3.60 = loss of .40
    but why its added in RE

    Factoring trade receivables 0·40

    November 22, 2016 at 10:17 pm #350804
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Where is this question?

    November 25, 2016 at 9:50 am #351372
    armaghanbutt
    Member
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 39
    • ☆☆

    robby june 2012 note 5

    November 27, 2016 at 9:25 pm #351997
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    Any difference between what we receive and what is derecognised as a receivable is taken through profit or loss, think of it as an irrecoverable debt expense. This is why when they’ve corrected the error and reinstated the receivable at $4 million they are also removing the expense of $0.4 million from profit or loss.

    The answer for the goodwill is far too complicated in the model answer. The easiest thing to do is to look at what we’ve paid, $16 million, and add the fair value of the previously held holding, $5 million, and this give you $21 million.

    Don’t stress about the finer details as you won’t have the time to do this in the real exam.

    Thanks

    November 28, 2016 at 9:20 am #352110
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    I understood the factoring part.

    i understood the goodwill part but what i want to now is in the RE they have recognised

    ‘Increase in fair value of equity interest – Zinc 2·00’

    shouldnt this be 3.00?

    ie the fair value of the equity interest 5.00
    (-) consideration paid (2.00)
    =increase in fair value of equity interest 3.00

    December 2, 2016 at 3:31 am #353030
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    can you please clear it for me 🙂

    December 5, 2016 at 1:06 am #353865
    amna
    Participant
    • Topics: 92
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    can you please clear it for me ?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Goodness on Accruals and Prepayments (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • mrjonbain on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • sadik.sadka on How to make the best use of OpenTuition
  • SONIC916 on Lessee accounting – ACCA (SBR) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in