• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

Revaluation Gains at S.F.P

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Revaluation Gains at S.F.P

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 14, 2016 at 8:19 pm #348960
    coop
    Participant
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 45
    • ☆☆

    Hello Sir,

    The revaluation gains presented at the financial position , as OCE ( Revaluation surplus ) .

    But the tax on that revaluation, how to be presented ?

    for example , Revaluation gains is 100.0$ and the tax on that gains is $20.00

    the amount of surplus at the balance sheet will be $ 100.00 as gross or net of tax $80.00 ?

    Thanks

    November 14, 2016 at 8:52 pm #348962
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 26
    • Replies: 22828
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Net $80 but with a full explanatory disclosure note

    November 14, 2016 at 10:36 pm #348970
    coop
    Participant
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 45
    • ☆☆

    But, then, the tax expense of ($20.000) would be included at S.F.P (under Equity) twice,

    one time at the retained earnings calculation, and one more at the Revaluation surplus

    (OCE) , Right?

    November 15, 2016 at 8:06 am #349013
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 26
    • Replies: 22828
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    In the same way that depreciation is shown twice – once as a deduction in arriving at net book value and again as a deduction in arriving at retained earnings!

    That tax about which you are concerned … it’s a deduction from the revaluation surplus and it’s a decrease in the tax charge

    Let’s revalue the asset by $100, say we have a balance brought forward of $850 on the deferred tax account, carrying values of other TNCA exceed tax values by $4,500 (not including that revalued asset) an estimated tax liability based on profits for the year of $620 and a tax rate of 20%

    Open 4 T Accounts – Deferred Tax (DT) Current Tax (CT) TNCA and Revaluation Reserve (RR)

    Put in the credit side of DT the amount brought forward $850 and in the debit side the amount carried forward $900 (20% x $4,500)

    In CT put in the debit side the amount of this year’s estimated liability carried forward $620

    Revalue the asset Dr TNCA $100 Cr RR $100

    Account for the deferred tax on the asset Dr RR $20 and Credit DT $20

    In DT carry down this extra deferred tax liability of $20 from debit side above the line to credit side below the line

    Balance off the DT account and take the balance to CT account

    Dr CT $50 Cr DT $50

    Balance off CT to SoPorL $670

    Balances now are:

    TNCA +$100
    RR $80
    DT $920
    CT $620

    Is that any better?

    November 15, 2016 at 10:17 am #349050
    coop
    Participant
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 45
    • ☆☆

    Thanks a lot for that explaination, it is understood, but i still have one inquiry :

    As it is known that the movement (difference) in both of tax provisions, and deferred tax brought forward & carried forward balances, represents the tax expense for the year .
    So, for calculating the tax expense it should be between (accumulated) balances .

    But, i always find at the questions the following statements :
    – an estimated tax liability based on profits for the year of $ 000 (above mentioned) .
    – a Provision for year ended is $ .
    – a provision of $ is required for current income tax on the profit of the year to 30 September 2014.
    all of them mean, they are attributable for the last year , not accumulated balance .
    Am i right ?
    Thanks

    November 15, 2016 at 11:24 am #349055
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 26
    • Replies: 22828
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This is the information that you need to carry down the figure that is given

    “– an estimated tax liability based on profits for the year of $ 18,200 means the same as

    – the provision for year ended is $18,200 is the same as

    – a provision of $18,200 is required for current income tax on the profit of the year to 30 September 2014 is the same as

    – the estimated liability for current tax based on the profits for the year is $18,200”

    Just different ways of saying the same thing

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • Ken Garrett on ACCA AB Chapter 19 – Macroeconomics – Questions
  • Ken Garrett on ACCA AB Chapter 19 – Macroeconomics – Questions
  • Ken Garrett on ACCA AB Chapter 19 – Macroeconomics – Questions
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Ken Garrett on The Nature of Performance Management – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy