- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>
Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › question
In practice question number 8, 2400 interest payable is regarded as a tax reduction. But why this finance expense is not an allowable expense to be deducted from the income while it is cottages that are rented and not a resedential property. I think the notes mention that finance expense is not an allowable expense only for resedential property and not cottages. So for cottages the finance expense should be treated as an allowable expense. Why is this not the case
Cottages are residential property as is any other type of property that is lived in by an individual. The distinction is with commercial property that is used for business purposes