• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Question 1 -15 December 2009

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Question 1 -15 December 2009

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 22, 2018 at 9:09 pm #438460
    ngalula75
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Hi Chris,

    I have just practice question one of Dec 2009 exam and paper. I am struggling to see where the PPE figures are coming from. are you able to provide your solution to that exam question?

    February 22, 2018 at 9:55 pm #438470
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi Marie,

    I’ve tried to break the answer down and have started with what I’d consider to be the easier aspects first, before briefly mentioning the ridiculously hard impairment at the end.

    The $5m is from the fair value adjustment for land in Park from our standard (W2). Don’t try and calculate it the way they’ve done it.

    The $4m is from the fair value adjustment for PPE in Fence from our standard (W2) and this is then depreciated to give the $0.53m reduction in PPE. Again do this in the same way as you would any normal net assets working.

    The reduction of $6m is from part (iv) where the land is transferred to IP as it is held for capital appreciation purposes.

    The revaluation of $4 comes from part (vi) being the increase from 8 million dinars at $1 = 2 dinars, to 12 million dinars at $1 = 1.5 dinars.

    The decrease of $28m is from the impairment in part (vii), which is far too complicated and if I’d have been doing it would have just compared the $862m carrying value from the financial statements without any adjustments to $830m and used $32m. Yes it is slightly incorrect but don’t waste time on the ridiculously hard aspects of the question.

    Hope this all helps.

    Thanks

    February 24, 2018 at 4:13 pm #438729
    ngalula75
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thanks for a prompt reply. Marie

    March 4, 2018 at 7:21 pm #440177
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ayeshaacca on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • @VIBHOR123 on FA Chapter 2 Questions The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in