• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Published Financial Statements

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Published Financial Statements

  • This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 1, 2016 at 5:54 am #330382
    zainab85
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi,

    I need your help in paper F7 Question 58 (Published financial Stt. / the previous edition revision kit). I’ve difficulty in solving the part V & IV as follows:

    Extract Trial Balance at 31 March 20X6:

    Inventory Dr US$ 36,000
    Trade Receivables DR US$ 47,100
    Bank CR US$ 11,500
    Revenue CR US$ 339,650
    COS DR US$ 207,750
    Administrative Exp. DR US$ 30,700
    Loan Interest Paid DR US$ 2,400

    Part (V): The Inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 20X6 due to operational reason. At this date its value was $ 36 million and this figure has been used in the cost of sales calculation above> Between the year end 31 March 20X6 and 4 April 20X6, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $ 2.7 million at mark-up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in the period were included in Highwood Purchases (as part of cost of sales) or revenue in the above trial balance.

    Part (IV): On 31 March 20X6 Highwood factored (sold) trade receivables with a book value of $ 10 million to Easyfiance. Highwood received an immediate payment of $ 8.7 million and will pay Easyfinance 2% per month on any uncollected balances. Any of the factored receivables outstanding after six months will be refunded to Easyfinance. Highwood has derecognised the receivables and charged $ 1.3 million to administrative expenses. If Highwood had not factored the receivables it would have made an allowance of $ 600,000 against them.

    I would be much appreciated you assistance, If you could explain the answer in details supported with any useful information (such as formula, etc…).

    Best Regards.

    Zainab

    August 2, 2016 at 7:07 am #330781
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I’m not surprised that you’re having a problem with point (V)!

    You’re missing some VITAL piece of information!

    “Part (V): The Inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 20X6 due to operational reason. At this date its value was $ 36 million and this figure has been used in the cost of sales calculation above> Between the year end 31 March 20X6 and 4 April 20X6, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $ 2.7 million at mark-up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in the period were included in Highwood Purchases (as part of cost of sales) or revenue in the above trial balance.”

    Can you check that you have correctly typed the sentence that begins “Between the year end …”

    Point (IV) (possibly point (vi) unless you’ve copied point number 5 before point number 4!)

    Highwood has not “sold” these Receivables because the risks and rewards have not been transferred “Any of the factored receivables outstanding after six months will be refunded to Easyfinance” tells us that the risk of non-collection from the Receivables is a cost that Highwood has to bear

    So we need to undo the entries that were put through to record this “sale” and then make the correct entries to reflect the reality of the situation

    Well, if it’s not a sale, what is it? It’s a loan from Easyfinance to Highwood

    Undo the “sale” entries

    Dr Receivables $10m
    Cr Cash $8.7m
    Cr Administrative expenses $1.3m

    That gets us back to the position BEFORE the “sale” transaction was (incorrectly) accounted for

    Now record the receipt of the cash as a secured loan from Easyfinance

    Dr Cash $8.7m
    Cr Loan creditor $8.7m

    Of course, you can see that in these two double entries I have first of all credited cash and then debited it. We can short cut this and combine the two separate entries into just one as follows …

    Dr Receivables $10m
    Cr Loan creditor $8.7m
    Cr Administrative expenses $1.3m

    Further, we now need to make a provision for doubtful debts (an allowance for receivables)

    Dr Finance costs (or administrative expenses) $.6m
    Cr Receivables $.6m

    OK?

    August 3, 2016 at 4:21 pm #330824
    zainab85
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Thanks for answering.

    Sorry for the missed information on part (V), the correct sentence is: Between the year end 31 March 20X6 and 4 April 20X6, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $ 2.7 million and made sales of 7.8 million at mark-up on cost of 30%.

    Waiting your answer please.

    August 3, 2016 at 9:24 pm #331235
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Part (V): The Inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 20X6 due to operational reason. At this date its value was $ 36 million and this figure has been used in the cost of sales calculation above> Between the year end 31 March 20X6 and 4 April 20X6, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $ 2.7 million and made sales of 7.8 million at mark-up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in the period were included in Highwood Purchases (as part of cost of sales) or revenue in the above trial balance.

    So, the inventory per the count was $36,000,000

    But included in that figure is the value of inventory received since the year end of $2,700,000 so that needs to be deducted to find the year end figure – now adjusted to $33,300,000

    But there have been sales since the year end of $7,800,000 at a mark up of 30% so we need to add those back in at cost

    100/130 * $7,800,000 is $6,000,000 and that figure is the cost value of the sold inventory

    So the correct year end inventory is $33,300,000 + $6,000,000 = $39,300,000

    OK?

    December 6, 2022 at 8:36 am #673614
    minhnguyen@abc
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    I also want to ask part (I) and part (IV) in this question :
    Part IV , this is the answer
    Deferred tax $’000
    Balance required at 31.3.X6 (27m ? 25%) 6,750
    Current balance (2,600)
    Deferred tax on revaluation (15m ? 25%) (3,750)
    Charge to current tax 400

    I don’t understand balance required, current balance and why it is charge to current tax

    And in part I, this is the answer

    As this is a convertible loan note, it has to be split between debt and equity:
    $’000
    Interest years 1–3 (2,400 ? (0.91 + 0.83 + 0.75) 5,976
    Repayment year 3 (30,000 ? 0.75) 22,500
    Liability component 28,476
    Equity component 1,524
    Cash received 30,000

    Liability component 28,476
    Interest (28,476 ? 10%) 2,848
    Less interest paid (2,400)
    Balance at 31.3.20X6 28,924

    I don’t understand ” As this is a convertible loan note, it has to be split between debt and equity”

    And how can we calculate equity component =1,524

    The interest is 2,848 and company paid 2,400 so why the interest is not = 0,448

    Thank you so much

    December 30, 2022 at 9:35 am #675225
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    The treatment for the convertible loan notes is the standard treatment where we are following the concept of substance over form. Work through the class noted and videos on this area of the syllabus.

    The tax is slightly more complicated than usual as the movement in the deferred tax is being adjusted for the revaluation of the PPE.

    Thanks.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in