• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

New! BPP Books for ACCA September 2022 Exams are now available, get your discount code >>

Previous auditor and entity in continuous business with early revenue recognitio

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Previous auditor and entity in continuous business with early revenue recognitio

  • This topic has 1 reply, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 10, 2021 at 7:14 pm #624533
    rafeeq2717
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi Sir, When examiner say that 30% received in advance and 70% is received on completion and the entity was being audited by predecessor auditors. Is it fair to answer that there is risk of early recognition of revenue. I am bit confused that should we always suspect that previous auditors was not audited properly and entity is not aware of accounting treatment. Is it only romm on opening balance and consistency to be considered. Could pls clarif?

    June 11, 2021 at 7:55 am #624610
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 87
    • Replies: 6079
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Revenue recognition is PRESUMED to be a significant RoMM except in the simplest of cases (e.g. rental income from a single property) – this comes from ISA 240.

    So whenever there is deposit/advance payment the RoMM must be of early recognition – before any performance. However, there could also be risk of understatement (too late recognition) if, in this case, some of the 70% should be recognised before completion. (It would depend on the questions – whether the performance is at a point in time – on completion – or earlier.)

    You don’t have to be critical of prior year auditors to comment on the risks associated with opening balances and consistency of accounting treatment – application of ISA 510 (Initial Audit Engagements – Opening Balances) is a REQUIREMENT.

    In any case, the auditor has to have sufficient appropriate audit evidence about opening balances and accounting policies – for a recurring audit, that’s on the prior year working papers. For an initial audit, the auditor is required to perform additional audit procedures. The purpose of these is NOT “to see whether the previous auditor did a proper audit”.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • Alistair02 on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • AymanR7 on Practice Question Klopp
  • Kyle on Translation of the subsidiary – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Discounting, Annuities, Perpetuities – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Joanne94 on Discounting, Annuities, Perpetuities – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2022 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy