• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

pre-issuance review

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › pre-issuance review

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 16, 2021 at 9:55 am #627918
    Noah098
    Member
    • Topics: 935
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “For listed entity audits, the EQCR should also consider:
    -Independence of the engagement team.
    – Whether appropriate consultation has taken place on contentious matters or differences of opinion.
    – Whether documentation reflects the work performed in relation to significant judgments.”

    maam i do not understand what’s the point in checking for all of these after the audit is complete, of course its before the audit report being issued, but then its already too late to do anything! Like even if EQCR reviewer realises the team was not independent or appropriate amount of consultations have not taken place on significant/contentious matters, there’s hardly any point crying over spilt milk?so then why are these done?

    July 16, 2021 at 11:43 am #627930
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 102
    • Replies: 6943
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    But it’s not “too late” – if indeed the reviewer were to find any issue that might cast doubt on the appropriateness of the audit opinion, the auditor’s report should NOT be issued until the matter is resolved.

    Of course, a firm required to carry out such reviews would not expect there to be such issues – but it’s the whole point of quality assurance that it such review procedures are required.

    The firm would be crying over split milk if it didn’t carry out the review and issued the auditor’s report and then something came to light later (!!!)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

 

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant Applied Skills exams is available NOW

NEW! Download the ACCA Pass Guide

FREE Verifiable CPD for ACCA Members

ACCA mock exams and debrief videos

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

ACCA CBE 2023 Exams

Instant Poll * How was your exam, and what was the result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Specially for OpenTuition students

20% off BPP Books

Get BPP Discount Code

Latest comments

  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kamo7293 on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hi?n on Investment Appraisal – NPV, IRR – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Ken Garrett on ACCA AB Chapter 19 – Macroeconomics – Questions

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy