• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

S's RE at acquisition day (P&RE q. 285 Paradigm)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › S's RE at acquisition day (P&RE q. 285 Paradigm)

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 15, 2019 at 3:34 pm #505229
    Anna
    Participant
    • Topics: 31
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Hello, I’ve the following issue.

    P acquired 75% of S on 1.10.2002. At 1.4.2002 RE of S were ($4 000) (a loss) and at the year ended 31.3.2003 RE showed a balance of $8 000. At the date of acquisition (1.10.2002) S produced a draft statement of P&L which showed net loss of $2 000 at that date. This figure served as a basis for calculating pre- and post-acquisition split of S’s profit for the year ended 31.3.2003.
    Answer says that retained earnings of S at the acquisition day were a loss of $6 000 ($4000 + $2000) and this figure is subtracted from the share capital to arrive at the net assets of S at the acquisition day.
    Why? At the day of acquisition the loss was $2 000 so why don’t we simply take this amount as a pre-acquisition RE and then calculate the post -acq RE as a movement: $2 000 plus $8 000. S must have made a $10 000 profit to arrive at $8 000 balance on RE, musn’t it ?

    Please advise, thank you!
    Anna

    February 16, 2019 at 12:39 pm #505314
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    It is a mid-year acquisition, and the loss of $2,000 is only the loss since the start of the period and not since the date the subsidiary was incorporated. The cumulative losses are the ones in retained earnings at the start of the year, plus the losses made in the current period.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • shravanm on ACCA AAA Employability and Technology Skills
  • MitaP on Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in