• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Picant-Intangible asset written off

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Picant-Intangible asset written off

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 25, 2022 at 6:39 pm #649345
    alawi sayed
    Participant
    • Topics: 301
    • Replies: 352
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Hello Sir,

    Regarding intangible asset ,there was an intangible asset during acquisition ,but it was written off shortly after acquisition. I don’t why it was deducted from net assets of NCI at acquisition .

    subsequently at the year end it was added again as a post acquisition adjustment in NCI profit .

    I am not sure of that ,can you please clarify that one please,

    Thanks,

    ————————–
    Q
    400 PICANT
    On 1 April 20X3 Picant acquired 75% of Sander’s equity shares in a share exchange of three
    shares in Picant for every two shares in Sander. The market prices of Picant’s and Sander’s
    shares at the date of acquisition were $3.20 and $4.50 respectively.
    In addition to this Picant agreed to pay a further amount on 1 April 20X4 that was contingent
    upon the post?acquisition performance of Sander. At the date of acquisition Picant assessed
    the fair value of this contingent consideration at $4.2 million, but by 31 March 20X4 it was
    clearthat the actual amount to be paid would be only $2.7 million (ignore discounting). Picant
    has recorded the share exchange and provided for the initial estimate of $4.2 million for the
    contingent consideration.
    On 1 October 20X3 Picant also acquired 40% of the equity shares of Adler paying $4 in cash
    per acquired share and issuing at par one $100 7% loan note for every 50 shares acquired in
    Adler. This consideration has also been recorded by Picant.
    Picant has no other investments.
    The summarised statements of financial position of the three entities at 31 March 20X4 are:
    Picant Sander Adler
    Assets $000 $000 $000
    Non?current assets
    Property, plant and equipment 37,500 24,500 21,000
    Investments 45,000 nil nil
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    82,500 24,500 21,000
    Current assets
    Inventory 10,000 9,000 5,000
    Trade receivables 6,500 1,500 3,000
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    Total assets 99,000 35,000 29,000
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    Equity
    Equity shares of $1 each 25,000 8,000 5,000
    Share premium 19,800 nil nil
    Retained earnings – at 1 April 20X3 16,200 16,500 15,000
    – for the year ended 31 March
    20X4
    11,000 1,000 6,000
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    72,000 25,500 26,000
    Non?current liabilities
    7% loan notes 14,500 2,000 nil
    Current liabilities
    Contingent consideration 4,200 nil nil
    Other current liabilities 8,300 7,500 3,000
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    Total equity and liabilities 99,000 35,000 29,000
    –––––– –––––– ––––––

    The following information is relevant:
    (i) At the date of acquisition the fair values of Sander’s property, plant and equipment
    was equal to its carrying amount with the exception of Sander’s factory which had a
    fair value of $2 million above its carrying amount. Sander has not adjusted the carrying
    amount of the factory as a result of the fair value exercise. This requires additional
    annual depreciation of $100,000 in the consolidated financial statements in the post?
    acquisition period.
    Also at the date of acquisition, Sander had an intangible asset of $500,000 forsoftware
    in its statement of financial position. Picant’s directors believed the software to have
    no recoverable value at the date of acquisition and Sander wrote it off shortly after its
    acquisition.
    (ii) At 31 March 20X4 Picant’s current account with Sander was $3.4 million (debit). This
    did not agree with the equivalent balance in Sander’s books due to some goods?in?
    transit invoiced at $1.8 million that were sent by Picant on 28 March 20X4, but had not
    been received by Sander until after the year end. Picant sold all these goods at cost
    plus 50%.
    (iii) Picant’s policy is to value the non?controlling interest at fair value at the date of
    acquisition. For this purpose Sander’s share price at that date can be deemed to be
    representative of the fair value of the shares held by the non?controlling interest.
    (iv) Impairment tests were carried out on 31 March 20X4 which concluded that the value
    of the investment in Adler was not impaired but, due to poor trading performance,
    consolidated goodwill was impaired by $3.8 million.
    (v) Assume all profits accrue evenly through the year.
    Required:
    (a) Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for Picant as at 31 March
    20X4. (15 marks)
    (b) At 31 March 20X4 the other equity shares (60%) in Adler were owned by many
    separate investors. Shortly after this date Spekulate (an entity unrelated to Picant)
    accumulated a 60% interest in Adler by buying shares from the other shareholders. In
    May 20X4 a meeting of the board of directors of Adler was held at which Picant lost its
    seat on Adler’s board.
    Required:
    Explain, with reasons, the accounting treatment Picant should adopt for its
    investment in Adler when it prepares its financial statements for the year ending
    31 March 20X5. (5 marks)
    (Total: 20 marks) ?
    ———————————

    Answer
    (a) Consolidated statement of financial position of Picant as at 31 March 20X4
    $000 $000
    Non?current assets:
    Property, plant and equipment (37,500 + 24,500 + 2,000
    FV adj – 100 FV depn)

    63,900
    Goodwill (16,000 – 3,800 (W3)) 12,200
    Investment in associate (W6)) 13,200
    –––––––
    89,300
    Current assets
    Inventory (10,000 + 9,000 + 1,800 GIT – 600 PUP (W7))) 20,200
    Trade receivables (6,500 + 1,500 – 3,400 intra?group (W7)) 4,600
    –––––– 24,800
    –––––––
    Total assets 114,100
    –––––––

    Equity and liabilities
    Equity attributable to owners of the parent
    Equity shares of $1 each 25,000
    Share premium 19,800
    Retained earnings (W5)) 27,500
    –––––– 47,300
    –––––––
    72,300
    Non?controlling interest (W4)) 8,400
    –––––––
    Total equity 80,700
    Non?current liabilities
    7% loan notes (14,500 + 2,000) 16,500
    Current liabilities
    Contingent consideration 2,700
    Other current liabilities (8,300 + 7,500 – 1,600 intra?
    group (W7)) 14,200
    –––––– 16,900
    –––––––
    Total equity and liabilities 114,100
    –––––––
    Workings (all figures in $ million)
    (W1) Group structure
    Picant
    75%
    Adler 40%
    Sander
    (1 year ago) (6 months ago)
    (W2) Net assets
    Acquisition
    Reporting
    date Post?acq’n
    $000 $000 $000
    Share capital 8,000 8,000 –
    Retained earnings 16,500 17,500 1,000
    Fair value adjustments:
    Factory 2,000 2,000 –
    Fair value depreciation (100) (100)
    Software written off (500) 500
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    26,000 27,400 1,400
    –––––– –––––– ––––––
    W3 W4/W5

    February 27, 2022 at 10:32 am #649439
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    If the asset was written off shortly after the acquisition date then we can take it that it should have had a zero value at the acquisition, hence why the net assets are reduced at the acquisition date.

    In the net assets working, this adjustment then feeds through to the post acquisition movement in retained earnings, where we are effectively removing from the subsidiary’s accounts the impact of them actually writing off the reduction in value as it is not a post-acquisition movement given that we have adjusted it at the acquisition date.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • alexgriff10 on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • MidnightWolfie on Operating segments (IFRS 8) – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Dinomain on Investment Appraisal Under Uncertainty: Expected Values (example 2) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • hoangacca on Cost Classification and Behaviour part 2 – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in