• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was

  • This topic has 183 replies, 102 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by Anonymous.
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 184 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 14, 2010 at 8:17 am #74632
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    yes, I had same results πŸ™‚

    I had the same results too. πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 8:30 am #74633
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    Ummm so i got my labour variance calculations right
    The way i saw it
    it was 750 Tvs and 650 Plasmas
    2,200 hours worked by permanent workforce, and total labour variance was 6,050 (A) for the temporary workers

    2 hours on Tv and 1.5 on Plasma
    So total hours worked – 2,475. Hours worked by temporary workers is (2,475-2,200) = 275 hours.

    Labour rate variance is 275 * $18 = $4,950
    Labour efficiency variance is 275 * ($18-$14) = $1,100 ($14 is the standard rate)

    Total is $6,050

    And also people sayin the optimal production is 1200 and 800 somethin are wrong because you can’t calculate shadow prices that way. I got the same 1200 and 800 something, but i have heard that we will get atleast 6-8 marks for defining objectives and workings. And maybe a mark or two for shadow price if we show the method, even if our product mix is wrong.

    Question 1 i expect atleast 12-14 and around 18 if my labour calculations are correct
    Question 2 atleast 16-18
    Question 3 max 8 marks
    Question 4 was a gift, i expect atleast 16-18
    And Question 5, ummm idk, around 12-14?

    IT was an easy paper but very unexpected

    December 14, 2010 at 8:36 am #74634
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @ivenny said:
    OMG.. My answer was x=828.57 and y=1,257.15 πŸ™
    but the binding constranits is it:
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600

    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    December 14, 2010 at 8:42 am #74635
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    December 14, 2010 at 8:47 am #74636
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    December 14, 2010 at 8:51 am #74637
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    no, but I got l=400 ,c=1400 or somethiing like that

    I think contribution was given in question though, I didn’t calculate it

    December 14, 2010 at 8:59 am #74638
    ivenny
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    I think there were 4 constraints in q3?

    2 constraints for materials
    1 constraint for skilled labour
    1 for Lotion max demand <2000

    no>?

    Yes Marcin, there were 4 constraints in Q3(actually should be 5 constraints last one should be x,y >=0)and 2 were binding constraints were contributed maximize equation which as follows:-
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000 grams -material
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600 minutes -labour
    thus, the answer should be cream (x)=828.57 and lotion (y) =1257.15
    The maximized contribution therefore : C=9x+8y =$17,514.33
    From above equation we can get the shadow price for material was $1.84 and slack was 142.86 grams.

    Hope all friends can pass the exam πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 9:00 am #74639
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    Yes, 4 constraints.
    Do you remember what was contribution maximise equation?

    no, I dont remember unfortunately..

    but my optimum plan was @ 400 and 1400 or something like that..

    well, I lost 6 marks on shadow price+ slack

    (but I gained 0.5 mark on non negativity equation:))

    December 14, 2010 at 9:09 am #74640
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 57
    • β˜†β˜†

    @ivenny said:
    Yes Marcin, there were 4 constraints in Q3(actually should be 5 constraints last one should be x,y >=0)and 2 were binding constraints were contributed maximize equation which as follows:-
    1. 3x + 2y = 5000 grams -material
    2. 4x + 5y = 9600 minutes -labour
    thus, the answer should be cream (x)=828.57 and lotion (y) =1257.15
    The maximized contribution therefore : C=9x+8y =$17,514.33
    From above equation we can get the shadow price for material was $1.84 and slack was 142.86 grams.

    Hope all friends can pass the exam πŸ™‚

    ok, so i have it all wrong…

    my constraints were:
    3Creams + 2 lotions < 5000
    1cream + 0.5 lotion<1600

    December 14, 2010 at 9:12 am #74641
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    Does anyone know when ACCA will publish exam answers?

    December 14, 2010 at 9:14 am #74642
    sharon1507
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 13
    • β˜†

    Im very demotivated….in fact the paper wasn’t that difficult but i’ve done many mistakes because i think i was too stressed!!!
    I’ve try all my possible during this semester and yet it was as if useless…
    A gud idea hw 2 change zis state of mind???help plz thx!!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 12:37 pm #74643
    ivenny
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • β˜†

    @marcin060482 said:
    ok, so i have it all wrong…

    my constraints were:
    3Creams + 2 lotions < 5000
    1cream + 0.5 lotion<1600

    Dun so disappointed, so long as you have working still can get mark πŸ™‚

    December 14, 2010 at 12:45 pm #74644
    KeshaM
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 36
    • β˜†

    I didnt indicate the question
    numbers attempted on the front cover of the
    booklet? Is that can be a problem?

    December 14, 2010 at 12:51 pm #74645
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    My permutation and combination did not work. I actually prepared and thought topics like Learning curve, Throughput, Risks and Uncertainty, would tested.
    Anyway, I attempted ABC, Variance, PM, and faint trial on others.

    I hope I will pass oooooooooooooooooooo

    Merry Xmas and a happy new year in advance.

    December 14, 2010 at 1:09 pm #74646
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    Paper was qute easy but still am not sure am gona pass it :!

    q:1 was easy except labour variances
    q:2 guys can u tell me how many of u prepare table calculations for financial measures like i ddnt prepare it seperatly just did in each heading e.g in sales growth i performd calculations about turnover etc… is it ok πŸ˜‰
    q:3 was a bit** didnt attempt it
    q:4 was easy
    q:5 is also easy excpet part 1

    December 14, 2010 at 1:41 pm #74648
    Irfan
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 9
    • β˜†

    the paper wasn’t difficult but i found it lengthy. I couldn’t complete it. Lost a complete 20 mark question due to it:(

    December 14, 2010 at 2:36 pm #74649
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 18
    • β˜†

    If i Pass THANKX TO JOHN if I FAIL still THANKS to JHON…whtever i did was owing to OPEN TUITION..but john plz guide students to calculate variance in a little quick way cuz i knew wht was going on with variance and what to do….but it was taking too much time!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 5:18 pm #74650
    michael13011991
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 45
    • β˜†β˜†

    OMG…..the paper was time pressuring…..i totally revised linear programming only to mess it up…got all the points…know how to calculate shadow price and slack but i included the FIXED COST and used that as one of my optimum point only afterward to find out that it was irrelevant!!!!! will ACCA punish me twice in part B for getting the points wrong?

    December 14, 2010 at 5:42 pm #74651
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • β˜†

    pretty nice paper….was really scared b4 the exam. F5 is a done deal to God’s glory.

    December 14, 2010 at 5:46 pm #74652
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 16
    • β˜†

    @grindmastah said:
    linear programming

    x= 825, y = 1275

    I have got C = 1066.67 and L = 1066.67
    Question 3 Linear programming
    Equations: (lines on the grapth!)
    4C+5L=9600
    3C+2L=5000
    C+0.5L=1600

    December 14, 2010 at 6:14 pm #74653
    bridmw
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 130
    • β˜†β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    I believe this is what I got also.

    Out of F5, F7 and F9 this diet – F5 definitely the easiest and least time pressured paper.

    December 14, 2010 at 6:56 pm #74654
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    q:2 guys can u tell me how many of u prepare table calculations for financial measures like i ddnt prepare it seperatly just did in each heading e.g in sales growth i performd calculations about turnover etc… is it ok????

    December 14, 2010 at 7:25 pm #74655
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • β˜†

    Give mooorrrrree tiiiiiiimmmmeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!

    December 14, 2010 at 8:00 pm #74656
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 8
    • β˜†

    @suso7 said:
    We`ve got the same figures. I hope we are right.

    same for me… that’s 3 of us lol. though i rounded of the slack to 143 grams.

    the thing is i forgot to tick on the front of the papers which answers i have attempted, though i have done all of them will they still check my papers and could get marks????

    December 14, 2010 at 8:13 pm #74657
    bridmw
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 130
    • β˜†β˜†

    @rochelleobar19 said:
    same for me… that’s 3 of us lol.

    Not much hope for you as an accountant – it’s actually 4.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 101 through 125 (of 184 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →
  • The topic ‘Paper F5 Dec 2010 exam was’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options: Β β€œRead the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • aesya on FA Chapter 10 Questions Books of Prime Entry
  • Emelyn on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Discounted cash flow techniques (part 1) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • lokeshdh00 on Discounted cash flow techniques (part 1) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • yuanbao on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2026 Β· Support Β· Contact Β· Advertising Β· OpenLicense Β· About Β· Sitemap Β· Comments Β· Log in